In the Matter of the Complaint of Gary J. Lucas
| Gary J. Lucas |
| In the Matter of the Complaint of Gary J. Lucas |
| Mary Reilly Woodman |
| 2:2020cv00742 |
| February 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| William F Kuntz |
| Vera M Scanlon |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MEMORANDUM in Support re #4 Order,,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,,, #1 Complaint, filed by In the Matter of the Complaint of Gary J. Lucas, Gary J. Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Poling, Kristin) |
Filing 4
ORDER: In light of Petitioner's Proposed Order, attached hereto, seeking, inter alia , to enjoin any state court proceedings stemming from the July 20, 20 19 incident described in the Complaint, the Court hereby ORDERS the following briefing schedule: Petitioner shall submit any supplemental briefing or other materials in support of the Proposed Order and the relief sought therein on or before Friday, March 13, 2020 at 5:00 P.M.; Any response or opposition to Petitioner's Proposed Order or the relief sought therein shall be submitted on or before Friday, April 3, 2020 at 5:00 P.M.; and Petitioner shall submit a reply, if any, on or before Friday, April 17, 2020 at 5:00 P.M. (See Order for details) SO Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 3/3/2020. (Tavarez, Jennifer)
|
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability against Mary Reilly Woodman Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Gary J. Lucas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Proposed Order, #4 Notice, #5 Civil Cover Sheet) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| FILING FEE: $ 400.00, receipt number ANYEDC-12372487 (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Incorrect Case Document Entry Information. Added missing Claimant, Mary Reilly Woodman, to the case. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint, Exhibit A, Exhibit B, Proposed Order, Notice and Civil Cover Sheet) initially filed as against Petitioner and re-entered Document Entry No. 1 as against Claimant. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Vera M. Scanlon. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
