Carberry et. al. v. Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc.
| Edward Williams and Thomas J. Carberry |
| Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02143 |
| May 12, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Joan M. Azrack: Civil Cause for Initial Conference (Tel) held on 7/8/2020. Case called. Counsel for all sides present. Other: Other: If the parties cannot agree on the necessary documents to be exchanged by 7/15/2020, they will proceed to discovery. Counsel shall notify the Court by 7/15/2020 if they need to proceed to discovery before Magistrate Judge Lindsay. (Coleman, Laurie) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is set for 7/8/2020 at 2:00 PM before Judge Joan M. Azrack and will be conducted through the AT&T teleconference center. Counsel shall dial 1-877-873-8017 and enter access code 4785432# at the prompt. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/25/2020. (Posillico, Lauren)
|
| Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. (Bizzaro, Thomas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas A. Bizzaro on behalf of Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Bizzaro, Thomas) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc.. (Bizzaro, Thomas) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Thomas J. Carberry. Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc. served on 5/18/2020, answer due 6/8/2020. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Service upon Defendant) (Wolf, William) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Rael Automatic Sprinkler Company, Inc.. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12785646 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Thomas J. Carberry and Edward Williams. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Wolf, William) Modified on 5/12/2020 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
