Santos v. Saul
| Jasmine Santos |
| Andrew Saul |
| 2:2020cv02601 |
| June 11, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Rachel P Kovner |
| Social Security: RSI Tax Suits |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
SCHEDULING ORDER: Plaintiff filed the complaint on 6/11/2020. The parties are directed to adhere to the following procedure, which the Eastern District of New York Board of Judges has adopted for expediting the disposition of Social Security cases (See ATTACHED Order for further details). So Ordered by Judge Rachel P. Kovner on 6/23/2020. (Chan, Tsz)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Andrew Saul. (Landow, Concetta) (Main Document 4 replaced on 6/11/2020) (Landow, Concetta). |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2020: #1 Additional Corrections) (Landow, Concetta). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Saul filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-12913753 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Jasmine Santos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (DeHaan, John) Modified on 6/11/2020 (Landow, Concetta). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Rachel P. Kovner and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Santos v. Saul | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Saul | |
| Represented By: | SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION - GENERIC |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jasmine Santos | |
| Represented By: | John W. DeHaan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
