Glatman et. al. v. The County of Suffolk et. al.
| Priscilla M. Velez, Barsch Kenneth, Joseph Uhl, David Glatman and Kenneth Barsch |
| The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, John Doe 3-10, John Doe 1, John Doe 2, Paul Margiotta and John Does 3-10 |
| 2:2020cv02986 |
| July 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Sandra J Feuerstein |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPLY in Support re #9 Order to Show Cause,, #10 Memorandum in Opposition,, filed by Kenneth Barsch, David Glatman, Joseph Uhl, Priscilla M. Velez. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support) (Lockwood, Scott) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Withdraw #11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Kenneth Barsch, David Glatman, Joseph Uhl, Priscilla M. Velez. (Lockwood, Scott) |
| Filing 11 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File by Kenneth Barsch, David Glatman, Joseph Uhl, Priscilla M. Velez. (Lockwood, Scott) |
| Filing 10 MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Order to Show Cause for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Declaration of Hope Senzer Gabor, #2 Ex. A, #3 Ex. B, #4 Ex. C, #5 Ex. D, #6 Ex. E, #7 Ex. F, #8 Ex. G, #9 Ex. H, #10 Ex. I, #11 Ex. J, #12 Ex. K, #13 Ex. L, #14 Ex. M, #15 Ex. N, #16 Declaration Ex. O, Declaration of Justin Smiloff, #17 Declaration Ex. P, Declaration of David Martinez) (Gabor, Hope) |
Filing 9
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: LET the Defendants show cause before this Honorable Court why an Order should not be issued, pursuant to Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, (1) prohibiting the Defendants from issuing preconviction license and/or driving privilege suspensions, or, at a minimum, from issuing such suspensions without providing notice and an opportunity to be heard; (2) requiring Defendants to rescind the suspensions imposed upon the four Plaintiffs in this matter; and Defendants' opposition to be served & filed by 8/26/20; Plaintiffs' Reply to be served & filed by 9/2/20. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. So Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 8/13/2020. (Cubano, Jazmin)
|
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Kenneth Barsch, David Glatman, Joseph Uhl, Priscilla M. Velez. (Attachments: #1 Declaration, #2 Memorandum in Support) (Lockwood, Scott) |
|
Filing 7
STIPULATION AND ORDER re #5 Stipulation Extending time to answer ot otherwise respond to the complaint filed by John Does 3-10, John Doe 2, The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency, Paul Margiotta, John Doe 1. All Defendants Answer due September 24, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 8/4/2020. (Ryan, Mary)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Hope Senzer Gabor on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Gabor, Hope) |
| Filing 5 STIPULATION Extending time to answer ot otherwise respond to the complaint by John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Does 3-10, Paul Margiotta, The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency (Gabor, Hope) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 10/8/2020 at 11:15 AM in Courtroom 1010 before Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein at the Central Islip Courthouse, located at 100 Federal Plaza, Central Islip, New York 11722. The parties shall appear with authority, or with individuals with authority, to settle this matter. Plaintiff(s) shall serve a copy of this Order upon Defendant(s) and file proof of such service with the Court.Ordered by Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein on 7/8/2020. (Disbrow, Sandra)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Paul Margiotta, The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Traffic and Parking Violations Agency. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Sandra J. Feuerstein and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13022101 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Kenneth Barsch, Joseph Uhl, David Glatman, Priscilla M. Velez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lockwood, Scott) Modified on 7/7/2020 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
