Soter Technologies, LLC v. IP Video Corporation et al
| Soter Technologies, LLC |
| A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc. and IP Video Corporation |
| Derek Peterson and Intelligent Product Solutions, Inc. |
| 2:2020cv02989 |
| July 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 32 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #26 Answer to Complaint,, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Derek Peterson, Soter Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Stipulation and [proposed] order extending time to reply to counterclaims and third party complaint) (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 31 SUMMONS Returned Executed by IP Video Corporation, Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc.. Intelligent Product Solutions, Inc. served on 8/25/2020, answer due 9/15/2020. (Matthews, Richard) |
| Filing 30 Summons Issued as to Derek Peterson. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 29 Summons Issued as to Intelligent Product Solutions, Inc. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 28 Proposed Summons. Re #26 Answer to Complaint,, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation (Isackson, Robert) |
| Filing 27 Proposed Summons. Re #26 Answer to Complaint,, Third Party Complaint,, Counterclaim, by Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation (Isackson, Robert) |
| Filing 26 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Derek Peterson, Intelligent Product Solutions, Inc., COUNTERCLAIM against Soter Technologies, LLC by Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Non-Disclosure Agreement) (Isackson, Robert) |
Filing 25
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for September 15, 2020 at 10:30 A.M. before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. The Initial Conference will be conducted by telephone. Counsel are directed to utilize the Court's teleconferencing line at (866) 590-5055, access code 9720458, at the time of the conference. No later than two business days before the Initial Conference, counsel for the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the Court's ECF system, a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. Counsel are on notice that the proposed discovery plan must be in compliance with the Local Patent Rules of the Eastern District of New York. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 8/18/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
|
ORDER granting #22 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to register for ECF within two (2) weeks. Registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, counsel shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that electronic notifications of activity in this case are received. Counsel shall also ensure the $150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 8/18/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
|
ORDER granting #24 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Counsel is directed to register for ECF within two (2) weeks. Registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, counsel shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that electronic notifications of activity in this case are received. Counsel shall also ensure the $150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 8/18/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
| Filing 24 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-13188214. by A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A- COGS, #2 Exhibit Ex B - Affidavit, #3 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Shores, Andrew) |
| Filing 23 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference to file motion to dismiss by A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation. (Isackson, Robert) |
| Filing 22 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-13137495. by A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex A- NC COGS, #2 Exhibit Ex B - VA COGS, #3 Exhibit Ex C - DC COGS, #4 Affidavit Ex D- Affidavit, #5 Proposed Order Proposed Order) (Matthews, Richard) |
| Filing 21 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren Brette Sabol on behalf of A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Sabol, Lauren) |
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Martin Schwimmer on behalf of A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Schwimmer, Martin) |
| Filing 19 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert M. Isackson on behalf of A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Isackson, Robert) |
| Filing 18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soter Technologies, LLC. Advance Convergence Group, Inc. served on 7/9/2020, answer due 7/30/2020. (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 17 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soter Technologies, LLC. A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc. served on 7/9/2020, answer due 7/30/2020. (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 16 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Soter Technologies, LLC. IP Video Corporation served on 7/9/2020, answer due 7/30/2020. (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Anne Gaddis on behalf of Soter Technologies, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Gaddis, Christine) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Hoskins Strate on behalf of Soter Technologies, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Strate, Christopher) |
| CASE REASSIGNED INTO PATENT PILOT PROGRAM. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case. (Corsini, Alexander) |
|
PATENT PILOT REASSIGNMENT ORDER. The Clerk of Court is directed to reassign this case from the patent pilot wheel.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 7/8/2020. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
| Filing 13 Summons Issued as to A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc.. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 12 Summons Issued as to Advance Convergence Group, Inc.. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Halo Smart Solutions, Inc.. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 10 Summons Issued as to IP Video Corporation. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 9 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Landow, Concetta) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2020: #8 Complaint) (Landow, Concetta). |
| Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 7 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2020: #1 Additional Corrections) (Landow, Concetta). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| This is a patent case and is eligible for the Patent Pilot Project. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Soter Technologies, LLC (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Soter Technologies, LLC (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 4 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Soter Technologies, LLC (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 3 Proposed Summons. Re #1 Complaint, by Soter Technologies, LLC (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Complaint, by Soter Technologies, LLC (Stein, Wendy) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against A+ Technology & Solutions, Inc., Advance Convergence Group, Inc., Halo Smart Solutions, Inc., IP Video Corporation filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13022473, filed by Soter Technologies, LLC. Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G) (Stein, Wendy) Modified on 7/7/2020 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
