Tenzer-Fuchs v. Unilever United States, Inc.
| Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs |
| SCHMIDT'S DEODORANT COMPANY LLC, d/b/a SCHMIDT'S NATURALS, Unilever United States, Inc. and Schmidt's Deodorant Company LLC doing business as Schmidt's Naturals |
| 2:2020cv03148 |
| July 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Unilever United States, Inc.. (Straub, Timothy) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Jon Straub on behalf of Unilever United States, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Straub, Timothy) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Unilever United States, Inc. answer due 10/9/2020. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 9/8/2020. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs. Unilever United States, Inc. served on 8/19/2020, answer due 9/9/2020. (Shalom, Jonathan) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Unilever United States, Inc. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Incorrect Case/Document/Entry Information. Original docket entry 5, AMENDED COMPLAINT against Schmidt's Deodorant Company LLC, filed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs, has been deleted since the new defendant was not added to the case. The amended complaint will be refiled by the clerk of the court. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Unilever United States, Inc., filed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 6 Proposed Summons. Re #5 Amended Complaint by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs (Shalom, Jonathan) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Schmidt's Deodorant Company LLC. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Schmidt's Deodorant Company LLC filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13068211 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes,, filed by Michelle Tenzer-Fuchs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Shalom, Jonathan) Modified on 7/16/2020 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
