Equity One (Northeast Portfolio), Inc. v. The Gap, Inc.
Equity One (Northeast Portfolio), Inc. |
The Gap Inc. and The Gap, Inc. |
2:2020cv03338 |
July 24, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Gary R Brown |
Steven Tiscione |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 ORDER DISMISSING CASE re #11 Stipulation to Remand - The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. SO Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/21/2020. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Remand by The Gap, Inc. (Schneider, Jesse) |
Filing 10 NOTICE: Pursuant to the order of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation filed today, notice is hereby given that a hearing session has been scheduled to consider various matters under 28 U.S.C. 1407. DATE OF HEARING SESSION: September 24, 2020. LOCATION OF HEARING SESSION: United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation; Thurgood Marshall Federal Judiciary Building; One Columbus Circle, NE; Washington, DC 20544-0005. TIME OF HEARING SESSION: 9:30 a.m. SCHEDULED MATTERS: Matters scheduled for consideration at this hearing session are listed on the enclosed Hearing Session Order and Schedule of Matters for Hearing Session. Section A of this Schedule lists the matters designated for oral argument by videoconference or teleconference and includes all actions encompassed by Motion(s) for transfer filed pursuant to Rules 6.1 and 6.2 and Orders to Show Cause filed pursuant to Rule 8.1(a). Any party waiving oral argument pursuant to Rule 11.1(d) need not participate in the Hearing Session videoconference or teleconference. Section B of this Schedule lists the matters that the Panel has determined to consider without oral argument, pursuant to Rule 11.1(c). Parties and counsel involved in these matters need not participate in the Hearing Session. (Florio, Lisa) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by The Gap, Inc. NOTICE OF FILING OF MOTION FOR COORDINATION AND CONSOLIDATION (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C) (Schneider, Jesse) |
ORDER re #8 : Defendant The Gap, Inc.'s request for a stay of this Action pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multi-district Litigation (the Panel) to accept transfer of federal court actions under 28 U.S.C. 1407 is hereby GRANTED. See In re COVID-19 Gap Lease Payment Litigation, MDL No. 2960. Defendant is directed to advise the Court whether transfer of the within Action has been accepted within 10 days of the Panel's decision or provide the Court with a status report within 45 days of the date of this Order, whichever is earlier. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/17/2020. c/ecf (Johnston, Linda) |
Filing 8 MOTION for pre motion conference This firm represents The Gap, Inc. ("Gap") in the above-referenced action (the "Action"). Gap requests a pre-motion conference to seek the Court's permission to make a motion to stay the Action pending a decision by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (the "Panel") to accept transfer of federal court actions under 28 U.S.C. 1407. See In re COVID-19 Gap Lease Payment Litigation, MDL No. 2960. by The Gap, Inc.. (Epstein, Joshua) |
Filing 7 Copy of DEFENDANTS THE GAP, INC, OLD NAVY, LLC, BANANA REPUBLIC, LLC, AND ATHLETA, LLCS MOTION TO TRANSFER UNDER 28 US.C 1407 originally filed BEFORE THE UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL ON MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION (Marziliano, August) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint , COUNTERCLAIM against Equity One (Northeast Portfolio), Inc. by The Gap, Inc.. (Schneider, Jesse) |
Filing 5 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Gap, Inc. (Schneider, Jesse) |
Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by The Gap, Inc. (Schneider, Jesse) Modified on 7/28/2020 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Davis, Kimberly) Modified on 7/28/2020 (Flanagan, Doreen). (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/28/2020: #1 Additional Quality Control Check Sheet) (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by The Gap Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, case number 607024/2020. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number CNYEDC-13112014) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Exhibits to Notice of Removal) (Schneider, Jesse) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.