Ortiz v. County Of Nassau et al
Alexander Ortiz |
ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY VICTORIA MAURI, County Of Nassau, DETECTIVE LUIS SALAZAR (Sh #908), NASSAU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER and its John Doe and Jane Doe Doctors and SANE Nurses, NASSAU COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY Madeline Singas, and John and Jane Doe Supervisors, NASSAU COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES and its John Doe and Jane Doe Caseworkers, Nassau County Police Department, Madeline Singas, Detective Luis A. Salazar, Victoria Mauri, Nassau University Medical Center and Nassau County Department of Social Services |
2:2020cv03469 |
July 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
William F Kuntz |
Steven I Locke |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response to Complaint (with consent of Plaintiff's counsel) by County Of Nassau, Victoria Mauri, Nassau County Department of Social Services, Nassau County Police Department, Luis A. Salazar, Madeline Singas. (Ben-Sorek, Liora) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to File. So Ordered by Judge William F. Kuntz, II on 9/23/2020. (Stykes, Jacqueline) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to County Of Nassau, Victoria Mauri, Nassau County Department of Social Services, Nassau County Police Department, Nassau University Medical Center, Luis A. Salazar, Madeline Singas. (Layne, Monique) |
Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Alexander Ortiz (Langer, Michael) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: Did not use the correct Summons form AO 440 Rev 6/12, SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION, Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge William F. Kuntz, II and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against County Of Nassau, Nassau County Police Department, Madeline Singas, Victoria Mauri, Nassau County Department of Social Services, Nassau University Medical Center, Luis Salazar filing fee $400, receipt number ANYEDC-13146729, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Alexander Ortiz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rollock, Donald) Modified on 8/3/2020 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.