Ates v. United States et al
| Murat Ates |
| Patrick Leis, III, Victoria Gumbs-Moore, Andrew Crecca, United States, Ferdag Dilay Altiner, Joan M. Azrack, State Of New York, Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk and Gary R. Brown |
| 2:2020cv04334 |
| September 15, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiff Murat Ates take nothing of the defendants State Of New York, Touro College Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center, United States, Victims Information Bureau of Suffolk, Andrew Crecca, Ferdag Dilay Altiner, Gary R. Brown, Joan M. Azrack, Patrick Leis, III, and Victoria Gumbs-Moore; that the Complaint is sua sponte dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B); that the Complaint is frivolous; that leave to amend is denied as futile; that in forma pauperis status for the purpose of any appeal is denied; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 10/26/2020 (Copy emailed to the pro se plaintiff with an appeal packet). (Toritto, Jim) |
Filing 5
MEMORANDUM & ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. However, for the reasons set forth above, the Complaint is sua sponte DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). Moreover, the Court finds that the Complaint is frivolous and leave to amend is DENIED as futile. Plaintiff is further ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE BY FILING AN AFFIDAVIT WITHIN THIRTY (30) DAYS OF THIS MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WHY AN ORDER SHOULD NOT BE ENTERED BARRING HIM FROM FILING A NEW COMPLAINT as further set forth herein. Plaintiff is advised that a failure to file an affidavit in accordance with this Order to Show Cause will lead to the entry of an order barring Plaintiff from filing any new complaint as set forth above unless it is accompanied by a separate application seeking leave to file the new complaint and the Court shall direct the Clerk of the Court to return any such filing to Plaintiff without docketing. The Clerk of the Court is directed to provide the pro se Plaintiff with a copy of this Memorandum and Order. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Memorandum and Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of any appeal. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 10/22/2020. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
|
| Filing 4 Letter from Pro Se Office to Pro Se Litigant dated 9/23/2020 Re: THIS LETTER ACKNOWLEDGES RECEIPT OF YOUR CIVIL ACTION(S). (Valle, Christine) |
| Filing 3 Notice of Related Cases: 20-cv-1477-JMA-AYS, 20-cv-1479-JMA-AYS, 20-cv-3590-GRB-AYS and 20-cv-3729-GRB-AYS The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Murat Ates. (Attachments: #1 IFP Application, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
