Brown v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. et al
| Ja'cori Lee Brown |
| Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Walmart Inc,, Sam's West, Inc., Denise Cangro and Sam's East Inc. |
| 2:2020cv04774 |
| October 6, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Kiyo A Matsumoto |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1201 Civil Rights (Disability) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint,,, by All Defendants. (Wyatt, Joshua) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Joshua J Wyatt on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Wyatt, Joshua) |
ORDER re #7 : The time for Denise Cangro; Sam's East Inc.; Sam's West, Inc.; Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Walmart Inc, to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including November 19, 2020.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 11/3/2020. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,,, by Denise Cangro, Sam's East Inc., Sam's West, Inc., Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Walmart Inc,. (Peikes, Lawrence) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence D. Peikes on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Peikes, Lawrence) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Scott William Clark on behalf of Ja'cori Lee Brown (notification declined or already on case) (Clark, Scott) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons Walmart Inc., #2 Summons Sam's East Inc., #3 Summons Sam's West Inc., #4 Summons Denise Cangro) (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Davis, Kimberly) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2020: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Kiyo A. Matsumoto and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $400, receipt number ANYEDC-13475972, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No, filed by Ja'Cori Lee Brown. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons for Defendant Denise Cangro, #3 Proposed Summons for Sams East Inc, #4 Proposed Summons for Sams West Inc, #5 Proposed Summons for Wal-Mart Associates Inc, #6 Proposed Summons for WalMart Inc) (Clark, Scott) Modified on 10/7/2020 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
