Markowitz v. Precipart Corporation
| Rachel Markowitz |
| Precipart Corporation |
| 2:2020cv05033 |
| October 20, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeannie Sha on behalf of Precipart Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Sha, Jeannie) |
| Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Precipart Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Precipart Group, Inc. for Precipart Corporation. (Ortego, Joseph) |
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Precipart Corporation. (Ortego, Joseph) |
SCHEDULING ORDER: Due to a change in the Court's calendar, the Initial Conference scheduled for February 11, 2021 is advanced to January 29, 2021 at 11:30 A.M. As noted, the Court will provide advance notice as to the manner in which the conference will be conducted. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/7/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
|
Filing 8
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for February 11, 2021 at 11:30 A.M. before Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. The Court will provide advance notice as to the manner in which the conference will be conducted. No later than two business days before the Initial Conference, counsel for the parties must submit, by means of electronic filing on the Court's ECF system, a Joint Proposed Discovery Plan. SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 12/3/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
|
ORDER terminating #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer as moot; granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended to December 7, 2020. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 11/2/2020. (Ameri, Mana)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, to Hon. A. Kathleen Tomlinson, U.S.M.J. by Precipart Corporation. (Ortego, Joseph) |
|
ORDER re #6 Letter MOTION. In accordance with the undersigned's individual rules, the motion for extension of time to respond to the Complaint must be redirected to the assigned Magistrate Judge. See II.e. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 10/30/2020. (Meil, Stephen)
|
| Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Precipart Corporation. (Ortego, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph John Ortego on behalf of Precipart Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Ortego, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Precipart Corporation. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PRECIPART CORPORATION filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13552517 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by RACHEL MARKOWITZ. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Ostrove, Rick) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Markowitz v. Precipart Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Rachel Markowitz | |
| Represented By: | Rick Ostrove |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Precipart Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Joseph John Ortego |
| Represented By: | Jeannie Sha |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
