Rothfeld v. Kimberley-Clark Corporation
| Dawn Rothfeld |
| Kimberly-Clark Corporation and Kimberley-Clark Corporation |
| 2:2020cv05647 |
| November 19, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Kimberley-Clark Corporation (Crain, Lee) |
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for Kimberley-Clark Corporation to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to February 5, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 12/30/2020. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
|
| Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Kimberley-Clark Corporation. (Crain, Lee) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Lee Ross Crain on behalf of Kimberley-Clark Corporation (aty to be noticed) (Crain, Lee) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dawn Rothfeld. Kimberley-Clark Corporation served on 12/7/2020, answer due 12/28/2020. (Palatiello, Jordan) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Robert Reese on behalf of Dawn Rothfeld (aty to be noticed) (Reese, Michael) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan S Palatiello on behalf of Dawn Rothfeld (aty to be noticed) (Palatiello, Jordan) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Kimberley-Clark Corporation. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 Letter MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically by Dawn Rothfeld. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Payment Confirmation ANYEDC-13712489, #2 Exhibit 2 - Payment Confirmation ANYEDC-13712764) (Murphy, James) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Defendant was added to the case incorrectly; docket entry 1 was deleted and re-entered against corrected defendant. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kimberley-Clark Corporation, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Dawn Rothfeld. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Rodin, Deanna) Modified on 11/20/2020 (Rodin, Deanna). |
| FILING FEE: $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-13712764 (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
