Rodriguez v. Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. et al
Susan Rodriguez |
Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. d/b/a East End Laundry, Andrew Scott Donnelly and Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. doing business as East End Laundry |
2:2020cv05869 |
December 3, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Ann M Donnelly |
Steven Tiscione |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Andrew Scott Donnelly, Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc.. (Domanick, Timothy) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: Defendants Andrew Scott Donnelly and Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. shall file an answer by 2/26/2021. If the parties have reached a settlement, the parties shall file a joint motion for judicial approval of the proposed settlement that includes the proposed settlement agreement and a letter brief addressing the factors discussed in Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc. by 2/26/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/27/2021. (Vasquez, Lea) |
Filing 6 Consent Motion for Extending Defendants' Time to Answer, Move or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Andrew Scott Donnelly, Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. (Domanick, Timothy) Modified on 12/21/2020 (DeSaro, Matthew). Modified on 12/21/2020 (DeSaro, Matthew). |
ORDER granting #6 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer: The time for all Defendants to answer is extended to February 1, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 12/21/2020. (DeSaro, Matthew) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy James Domanick on behalf of Andrew Scott Donnelly, Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Domanick, Timothy) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
Case Assigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew Scott Donnelly, Woodchuck Hollow Management, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-13779675 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Susan Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nardo, Raymond) Modified on 12/4/2020 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.