Mustakis v. Sanofi US
| Jimmy Mustakis |
| Sanofi US |
| 2:2020cv05895 |
| December 4, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Pre Motion Conference.A pre-motion telephone conference is scheduled for March 4, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. before Judge Gary R. Brown, at which time the parties should be prepared to address defendant's anticipated motion pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DE 7. The parties are to call (888) 363-4734 using ACCESS CODE 4132441 five minutes prior to the designated time.The parties are on notice that in appropriate cases, the pre-motion letters and the responses, along with the parties' arguments made at the pre-motion conference, may be construed at the discretion of the Court as the motion itself. Arguments not raised in the pre-motion letters or during the pre-motion conference shall be deemed waived. See In re Best Payphones, Inc., 450 F. App'x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011).At the conference, the Court will issue a briefing schedule if necessary. Plaintiff is directed to respond to DE 7 in accordance with the undersigned's individual rules by February 8, 2021. Before requesting an adjournment, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint letter with several proposed dates. The parties and other attendees to the conference are also reminded that the recording of any proceeding of the Court, including this conference, is prohibited under Local Rule 1.8. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 1/23/2021. (Meil, Stephen)
|
| Filing 7 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Sanofi US. (Gordon, Keara) |
|
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Sanofi US answer due 1/22/2021. The Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and PROPOSED ORDER by Sanofi US extending defendant's time to January 22, 2021 to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is approved and hereby entered as an Order of the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 1/3/2021. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer and [PROPOSED] ORDER by Sanofi US. (Gordon, Keara) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Sanofi US. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Complaint by Jimmy Mustakis (Sultzer, Jason) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sanofi US Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Jimmy Mustakis. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit) (Sultzer, Jason) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The second page of the Civil Cover Sheet is missing. The current 2 page document can be found on the court's website. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number ANYEDC-13785503 (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Mustakis v. Sanofi US | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sanofi US | |
| Represented By: | Keara M. Gordon |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jimmy Mustakis | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Lipari |
| Represented By: | Michael Robert Reese |
| Represented By: | Jason P. Sultzer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
