Washington v. The County of Suffolk et. al.
| Devon Washington |
| The Suffolk County Police Department, The County Of Suffolk, Suffolk County Police Officer, Police Officer John Doe 1-4, Police Officer "John" Steck, Suffolk Coutnty Police Officer, The Suffolk County Poice Department and Police Officers John Doe #1 through John Doe #4 |
| 2:2020cv06219 |
| December 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Frederic Block |
| A Kathleen Tomlinson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Frederic Block and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Incorrect Case/Document Entry Information. Deleted all Defendants and re-entered Defendants to conform to the Verified Complaint. Deleted Document Entry No. 1 (Complaint) and re-entered as against all Defendants. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Devon Washington (Thompson, Walter) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, #1 Complaint, by Devon Washington (Thompson, Walter) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. All questions in the NY-E Division of Business Rule 50.1(d)(2) have to be completed on page 2. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Please submit a Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Devon Washington against John Doe #1 through John Doe #4, "John" Steck, Suffolk Coutnty Police Officer, The County of Suffolk, The Suffolk County Poice Department Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Devon Washington. (Flanagan, Doreen) Modified on 1/8/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number BNYEDC-1387990 (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
