Confusione et al v. Autozoners, LLC
Plaintiff: Keith Confusione and Randolph Brannigan
Defendant: Autozoners, LLC
Case Number: 2:2021cv00001
Filed: January 2, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Anne Y Shields
Nature of Suit: Labor: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2021 Filing 12 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Autozoners, LLC. (Riley, Laurie)
February 9, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Tracy E. Kern on behalf of Autozoners, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Kern, Tracy)
February 9, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Laurie M. Riley on behalf of Autozoners, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Riley, Laurie)
February 7, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #9 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorneys shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorneys shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that they receive electronic notification of activity in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 2/7/2021. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
February 5, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14105230. by Autozoners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice) (Riley, Laurie)
February 5, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Tracy E. Kern Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14105046. by Autozoners, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support Affidavit in Support of Motion for Pro Hac Vice) (Kern, Tracy)
January 25, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael David Billok on behalf of Autozoners, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Billok, Michael)
January 23, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. Defendant Autozoners, LLC time to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is EXTENDED to 3/1/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 1/23/2021. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
January 22, 2021 Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to the Complaint by Autozoners, LLC. (Moller, Jessica)
January 11, 2021 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by David Donald Barnhorn on behalf of Randolph Brannigan, Keith Confusione (aty to be noticed) (Barnhorn, David)
January 4, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Autozoners, LLC. (Landow, Concetta)
January 4, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
January 4, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
January 4, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
January 2, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Autozoners, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-13924008 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Keith Confusione, Randolph Brannigan. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Romero, Peter) Modified on 1/4/2021 (Landow, Concetta).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Confusione et al v. Autozoners, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Keith Confusione
Represented By: Peter Arcadio Romero
Represented By: David Donald Barnhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Randolph Brannigan
Represented By: Peter Arcadio Romero
Represented By: David Donald Barnhorn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Autozoners, LLC
Represented By: Jessica C. Moller
Represented By: Laurie M. Riley
Represented By: Michael David Billok
Represented By: Tracy E. Kern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?