Fernandez v. Westhampton Care Center et al
| Evelin Fernandez |
| Jane Montanaro and Westhampton Care Center |
| 2:2021cv00183 |
| January 21, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Letter from Pro Se Office to Pro Se Litigant dated 3/17/2021 Re: The Clerk's Office received your proposed civil summons and has issued an official stamped summons. Enclosed, please find the original and a copy of this summons in addition to instructions on the service of the summons and complaint. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Jane Montanaro, Westhampton Care Center. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 7 Letter from Pro Se Litigant dated 3/16/2021 Re: Proposed Summons. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re #5 Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Your proposed summons was not issued for one of the following reasons: The name on the summons does not match the name as it appears on the complaint., Please correct and resubmit using Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
| Filing 5 Proposed Summons filed by Pro Se Litigant Evelin Fernandez dated 2/25/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel) |
Filing 4
ORDER: Accordingly (PLEASE SEE ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS), if service is not made upon defendants by April 21, 2021, or plaintiff fails to show good cause why such service has not been affected, the complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. Plaintiff is to provide a copy of this Order to defendants along with the summonses and complaint and shall file proof of service with the Court. Plaintiff is required to advise the Clerk of Court of any changes of address. Failure to keep the Court informed of plaintiff's current address may result in dismissal of the case. So Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/18/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
| Filing 3 Letter from Pro Se Office to Plaintiff informing of the case number and Judge assigned. General case opening paperwork included in mailing. CM 2/8/21 (Grady, Jessica) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| FILING FEE: $ 402.00, receipt number 30616 (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Evelin Fernandez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
