Pacifico v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et. al.
Plaintiff: Alex Pacifico
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-10 and Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv00203
Filed: January 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Steven Tiscione
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 25, 2021 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Defendant shall serve its opening brief on plaintiff by no later than March 23, 2021. Plaintiff shall serve an opposition by no later than April 13, 2021. Defendant shall serve its reply, and file the fully briefed motion in accordance with the Court's individual rules, by April 27, 2021. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/25/2021. (Walsh, Catherine).
February 23, 2021 Filing 10 Proposed Scheduling Order (Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule re: Motion to Compel Arbitration per the Court's February 16, 2021 Order) by Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Briganti, Dana)
February 16, 2021 Filing 9 STATE COURT RECORD Received from Supreme Court of the State of NY, Ctny. of Suffolk, 619392/2020; Received Clerk's Minutes and Notice of Removal. (Ortiz, Grisel)
February 16, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #5 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. The Court waives its pre-motion conference requirement and grants Defendant's request to file a motion to compel arbitration. The parties are directed to file a proposed briefing schedule by 2/23/2021. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 2/16/2021. (Walsh, Catherine).
February 9, 2021 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Briganti, Dana)
February 4, 2021 Filing 7 STATE COURT RECORD Received from Supreme Court of the State of NY, Ctny. of Suffolk, 619392/2020; Received clerk's minutes and notice of removal. (Ortiz, Grisel)
January 28, 2021 Filing 6 REPLY in Opposition re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Motion to Compel Arbitration , RESPONSE to Motion re #5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Motion to Compel Arbitration filed by Alex Pacifico. (Goldenberg, Simon)
January 21, 2021 Filing 5 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference regarding Motion to Compel Arbitration by Midland Credit Management, Inc.. (Briganti, Dana)
January 14, 2021 Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 14, 2021 Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
January 14, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Ellen Beth Silverman on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Silverman, Ellen)
January 14, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Midland Credit Management, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk, Case Number 619392/2020. Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-13988997) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Briganti, Dana) Modified on 1/14/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen).
January 14, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pacifico v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alex Pacifico
Represented By: Simon Goldenberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John and Jane Does 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Midland Credit Management, Inc.
Represented By: Dana Brett Briganti
Represented By: Ellen Beth Silverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?