Patel et al v. Singh et al
Plaintiff: Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel, Lalit Patel individually and as a partner of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice and Pratik Patel individually andn as a shareholder of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice
Defendant: Arjun Singh, Noddy Singh and Arjun Singh individually and as shareholders of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice
Case Number: 2:2021cv00759
Filed: February 11, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Steven I Locke
Referring Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2021 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC ORDER: re #18 Letter. The Court sets the following briefing schedule on Plaintiff's motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims: Plaintiff shall file its motion on or before April 12, 2021; Defendants shall file their opposition on or before April 26, 2021; and Plaintiff shall file its reply, if any, on or before May 3, 2021. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/2/2021. (Dimarco, Nicholas)
April 1, 2021 Filing 18 Letter with proposed joint briefing schedule for anticipated Motion to Dismiss Defendants' Counterclaims by Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel (Kadochnikov, Alex)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 17 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery deadlines set; see attached amended order. The Next Tele- Status Conference set for 5/20/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. The parties should dial 1-877-336-1829 and enter access code 3002871# at the prompt. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 3/29/2021. (Gandiosi, Kristin)
March 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke:Initial Conference Hearing held on 3/29/2021. The court has amended and So Ordered the joint proposed scheduling order #15 submitted by the parties. The parties proposed scheduling order, DE [15-1], is adopted with the following modifications: (1) there is no expert discovery and so the related deadlines are deleted; and (2) the deadline to commence summary judgment motion practice is moved up to November 29, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 3/29/2021. (Gandiosi, Kristin)
March 26, 2021 Opinion or Order ELECTRONIC ORDER denying #14 Letter-Motion for Pre-Motion Conference. The Court has reviewed Plaintiffs' request for a pre-motion conference (ECF No. #14 ). In its discretion, the Court waives its pre-motion conference requirement, and Plaintiffs are GRANTED leave to file their anticipated motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims. The parties are further directed to meet and confer about a briefing schedule and submit a proposed schedule for Court approval no later than April 2, 2021. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 3/26/2021. (Dimarco, Nicholas)
March 24, 2021 Filing 15 Proposed Scheduling Order by Lalit Patel(individually and as a partner of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice), Pratik Patel(individually andn as a shareholder of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice) (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Kadochnikov, Alex)
March 15, 2021 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference re #14 Letter, See #14 for attachment by Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel. (Valle, Christine)
March 15, 2021 Filing 14 Letter Requesting a Pre-Motion Conference to Honorable Seybert by Lalit Patel(individually and as a partner of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice), Pratik Patel(individually andn as a shareholder of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice) (Kadochnikov, Alex)
March 5, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 13 INITIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: A Telephonic Initial Conference is set for 3/29/2021 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. The parties should dial 1-877-336-1829 and enter access code 3002871# at the prompt. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 3/5/2021. (Attachments: #1 SIL Individual Rules, #2 Scheduling Order Worksheet) (Gandiosi, Kristin)
March 4, 2021 Filing 12 AMENDED ANSWER to Plaintiffs' Complaint , Amended COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corporate filing receipt and Certificate of Incorporation) (Walia, Bobby)
March 2, 2021 Filing 11 Defendants ANSWER to #1 Complaint, , COUNTERCLAIM against All Plaintiffs by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Corporate filing receipt and Certificate of Incorporation) (Walia, Bobby)
February 26, 2021 Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pratik Patel, Lalit Patel. Arjun Singh served on 2/20/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (Kadochnikov, Alex)
February 26, 2021 Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Pratik Patel, Lalit Patel. Noddy Singh served on 2/20/2021, answer due 3/15/2021. (Kadochnikov, Alex)
February 12, 2021 Filing 8 Summons Issued as to Arjun Singh. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 12, 2021 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Noddy Singh. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 12, 2021 Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 12, 2021 Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 12, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 11, 2021 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel (Kadochnikov, Alex)
February 11, 2021 Filing 3 Proposed Summons. by Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel (Kadochnikov, Alex)
February 11, 2021 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. by Lalit Patel, Pratik Patel (Kadochnikov, Alex) (Main Document 2 replaced for statistical purposes on 2/12/2021) (Florio, Lisa).
February 11, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Arjun Singh, Noddy Singh filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14133418 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Pratik Patel, Lalit Patel. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Partnership Contract, #2 Exhibit B - Department of Taxation and Finance Letter, #3 Exhibit C - Demand for Books and Records) (Kadochnikov, Alex)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patel et al v. Singh et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lalit Patel
Represented By: Alex Kadochnikov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pratik Patel
Represented By: Alex Kadochnikov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lalit Patel individually and as a partner of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice
Represented By: Alex Kadochnikov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Pratik Patel individually andn as a shareholder of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice
Represented By: Alex Kadochnikov
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arjun Singh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Noddy Singh
Represented By: Bobby Walia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arjun Singh individually and as shareholders of Pan King, Inc. d/b/a NY Chicken & Rice
Represented By: Bobby Walia
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?