Boyd v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Plaintiff: Lee Boyd
Defendant: Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Petitioner: Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart and Elizabeth Agramonte
Case Number: 2:2021cv00884
Filed: February 18, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joanna Seybert
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 25, 2021 Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion re #8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases RESPONSE BY THE STEWART PLAINTIFFS TO THE ALBANO PLAINTIFFS UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS TO MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION AND TO SET DEADLINES filed by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart. (Liskow, Michael)
March 22, 2021 Filing 18 Proposed Pretrial Order by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart (Pollack, Janine)
March 22, 2021 Filing 17 DECLARATION re #16 Reply in Support by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Pollack, Janine)
March 22, 2021 Filing 16 REPLY in Support re #8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart. (Pollack, Janine)
March 15, 2021 Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14277790. by Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Smith, Alexander)
March 15, 2021 Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14277692. by Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Spelman, Kate)
March 15, 2021 Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14277598. by Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Indiana Certificate of Good Standing, #4 Proposed Order) (Panos, Dean)
March 15, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The deadline for Defendant Hain Celestial Group, Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to April 30, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson on 3/15/2021. (Wolf, Deanna)
March 12, 2021 Filing 12 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, (unopposed) by Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Ross, Michael)
March 12, 2021 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael W. Ross on behalf of Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Ross, Michael)
March 8, 2021 Filing 10 Request for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically approved for reimbursement by Michael J. Kramer, Acting Chief Deputy Clerk, on 3/8/2021.
March 3, 2021 Filing 9 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in Civil Action Case No. 2:21-cv-01118 (JMA)(AKT) indicates that this case is a related case. (Flanagan, Doreen)
February 28, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Nicole Stewart, Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Pollack, Janine)
February 25, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Lee Boyd. Hain Celestial Group, Inc. served on 2/23/2021, answer due 3/16/2021. (Barrack, Jeffrey)
February 23, 2021 Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Refund of Fees Paid Electronically for Complaint filing by Lee Boyd. (Barrack, Jeffrey)
February 19, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Flanagan, Doreen)
February 19, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates that Case Nos. 2:21-cv-00678 (JS)(AYS), 2:21-cv-00758 (JS)(SIL) and 2:21-cv-00805 (SJF)(SIL) are related cases. (Flanagan, Doreen)
February 19, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
February 19, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) (Main Document 2 replaced on 2/19/2021) (Flanagan, Doreen).
February 19, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
February 18, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hain Celestial Group, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number CNYEDC-14166933 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Lee Boyd. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Barrack, Jeffrey) (Main document and attachments 1 and 2 replaced for statistical purposes on 2/19/2021) (Florio, Lisa).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Boyd v. Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Represented By: Michael W. Ross
Represented By: Kate Spelman
Represented By: Alexander Smith
Represented By: Dean N. Panos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lee Boyd
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Barrack
Represented By: Michael Arthur Toomey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Summer Apicella
Represented By: Janine Lee Pollack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nicole Stewart
Represented By: Janine Lee Pollack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Elizabeth Agramonte
Represented By: Janine Lee Pollack
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?