Baumgarten v. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.
Leiba Baumgarten |
The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. |
Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart and Elizabeth Agramonte |
2:2021cv00944 |
February 22, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Joan M Azrack |
Steven Tiscione |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 REPLY to Response to Motion re #4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases RESPONSE BY THE STEWART PLAINTIFFS TO THE ALBANO PLAINTIFFS UNTIMELY OBJECTIONS TO MOTION FOR CONSOLIDATION AND TO SET DEADLINES filed by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart. (Liskow, Michael) |
Filing 10 Proposed Pretrial Order by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart (Pollack, Janine) |
Filing 9 DECLARATION re #8 Reply in Support by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit) (Pollack, Janine) |
Filing 8 REPLY in Support re #4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella, Nicole Stewart. (Pollack, Janine) |
ORDER granting #7 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. answer due 4/30/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 3/16/2021. (Vasquez, Lea) |
Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by The Hain Celestial Group, Inc.. (Ross, Michael) Modified on 3/16/2021 (Vasquez, Lea). |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael W. Ross on behalf of The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Ross, Michael) |
Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Leiba Baumgarten. The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. served on 2/25/2021, answer due 3/18/2021. (Sultzer, Jason) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Nicole Stewart, Elizabeth Agramonte, Summer Apicella. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Proposed Order) (Pollack, Janine) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Hain Celestial Group, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14178360 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Leiba Baumgarten. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Sultzer, Jason) |
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.