Town of Riverhead v. The 3M Company et al
Plaintiff: Town of Riverhead
Defendant: The Chemours Company, E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. and E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv01034
Filed: February 25, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Anne Y Shields
Nature of Suit: Tort Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 15, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER: Initial Conference set for 5/18/2021 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields.The parties are directed to call the ATTteleconferencing center at (877) 810-9415 and to enter Access Code9005911 when prompted. See Order and Attachments. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 4/15/2021. (Attachments: #1 AYS Rules, #2 Initial Joint Letter Requirements) (Torres, Jasmine)
March 31, 2021 Filing 14 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Chemours Company. (Watson, Natalie)
March 31, 2021 Filing 13 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company. (Watson, Natalie)
March 29, 2021 Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Chemours Company (Kurzweil, Lanny)
March 29, 2021 Filing 11 Corporate Disclosure Statement by E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (Kurzweil, Lanny)
March 29, 2021 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Lanny S. Kurzweil on behalf of E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company (aty to be noticed) (Kurzweil, Lanny)
March 24, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #9 Motion for Discovery. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 3/24/2021. (Minerva, Deanna)
March 23, 2021 Filing 9 Letter MOTION for Discovery Joint Letter re: Threshold Discovery Scheduling by The 3M Company. (Calica, Andrew)
March 19, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jordan David Sagalowsky on behalf of The 3M Company (aty to be noticed) (Sagalowsky, Jordan)
March 19, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew J. Calica on behalf of The 3M Company (aty to be noticed) (Calica, Andrew)
March 19, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer: E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company answer due 3/31/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 3/19/2021. (Minerva, Deanna)
March 18, 2021 Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company. (Watson, Natalie)
March 16, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields (as related to 19-cv-4608)for all further proceedings. Judge Joan M. Azrack, Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/16/2021. (Davis, Kimberly)
February 26, 2021 Filing 5 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 26, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons E.I. DuPont de Nemours, #2 Summons The Chemours Company) (Rodin, Deanna)
February 26, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 26, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 26, 2021 Incorrect Document Entry Information. Defendant was added to the case incorrectly; docket entry 1 was deleted and re-entered against corrected defendant. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 26, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
February 25, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Town of Riverhead. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons The 3M Company, #3 Proposed Summons E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company, #4 Proposed Summons The Chemours Company) (Rodin, Deanna) (Attachment 1 replaced for statistical purposes on 2/26/2021) (Florio, Lisa).
February 25, 2021 FILING FEE: $402, receipt number ANYEDC-14205051 (Rodin, Deanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Town of Riverhead v. The 3M Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Town of Riverhead
Represented By: Matthew K Edling
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Chemours Company
Represented By: Lanny S. Kurzweil
Represented By: Natalie S. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The 3M Company
Represented By: Andrew J. Calica
Represented By: Jordan David Sagalowsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.
Represented By: Andrew J. Calica
Represented By: Jordan David Sagalowsky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company
Represented By: Lanny S. Kurzweil
Represented By: Natalie S. Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?