Mott v. Goncalves et. al.
Plaintiff: Geoffrey T. Mott
Defendant: Jose Goncalves and Goncalves Construction Corporation
Case Number: 2:2021cv01949
Filed: April 12, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 6901 Resource & Recovery Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 8, 2021 Filing 12 REPLY in Opposition re #11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference Letter to Judge Azrack: Request for One Week Extension to Respond to Defendants' Letter filed by Geoffrey T. Mott. (Kazin, Andrew)
June 8, 2021 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER re #12 Reply in Opposition filed by Geoffrey T. Mott. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' pre-motion conference letter by June 18, 2021. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 6/8/2021. (Terranova, Robert)
June 4, 2021 Filing 11 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Jose Goncalves, Goncalves Construction Corporation. (Hallak, Daniel)
May 18, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for Jose Goncalves and Goncalves Construction Corporation to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to and including June 7, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 5/18/2021. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
May 17, 2021 Filing 10 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Jose Goncalves, Goncalves Construction Corporation. (Hallak, Daniel)
May 17, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Daniel Scott Hallak on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Hallak, Daniel)
May 17, 2021 Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jack M. Martins on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Martins, Jack)
May 4, 2021 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Geoffrey T. Mott. Jose Goncalves served on 5/3/2021, answer due 5/24/2021. (Kazin, Andrew)
May 3, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Geoffrey T. Mott. Goncalves Construction Corporation served on 4/29/2021, answer due 5/20/2021. (Kazin, Andrew)
April 14, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Jose Goncalves, Goncalves Construction Corporation. (Ortiz, Grisel)
April 13, 2021 Filing 4 Proposed Summons. by Geoffrey T. Mott (Kazin, Andrew)
April 13, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 13, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 13, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 13, 2021 Your Proposed Summons was not issued for the following reason: The section that reads "The answer or motion must be served on Plaintiff or Plaintiff's attorney, whose name and address are:" has not been completed. Please correct the Proposed Summons and resubmit using the event Other Filings - Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Flanagan, Doreen)
April 12, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jose Goncalves, Goncalves Construction Corporation filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14362629 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - No,, filed by Geoffrey T. Mott. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kazin, Andrew) Modified on 4/13/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Mott v. Goncalves et. al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Geoffrey T. Mott
Represented By: Andrew Scott Kazin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jose Goncalves
Represented By: Jack M. Martins
Represented By: Daniel Scott Hallak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Goncalves Construction Corporation
Represented By: Jack M. Martins
Represented By: Daniel Scott Hallak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?