Nicholson et al v. ARStrat, LLC
| Elvira Nicholson and Eric I. Honig |
| ARStrat, LLC |
| 2:2021cv02510 |
| May 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| James M Wicks |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by ARStrat, LLC (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by ARStrat, LLC. (Sanders, Arthur) |
Filing 11
ORDER Granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. ARStrat, LLC answer due 6/10/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 5/21/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
| Filing 10 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by ARStrat, LLC. (Sanders, Arthur) |
|
SCHEDULING ORDER Re #9 Initial Conference Scheduling Order: Due to a conflict in this Court's calendar, the in-person initial conference set for 8/11/2021 at 3:00 PM will now be held on 9/1/2021 at 10:00 AM. The Discovery Plan Worksheet and settlement statements shall be submitted no later than 8/25/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 5/20/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 9
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 3:00 pm on 8/11/2021 before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks in Courtroom 1020. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than 8/4/2021. Because this is a FDCPA case, each individual client and/or a principal with full settlement authority for a corporation or other business entity must personally appear with counsel at this initial conference. Upon failure to appear at the conference with authorized clients, the Court will entertain an application for fees and costs by the opposing side. Parties are to submit their respective settlement positions ex parte to Chambers email at Wicks_chambers@nyed.uscourts.gov no later than 8/4/2021. Do not file settlement positions on ECF, and do not share settlement positions with opposing counsel. Counsel are to refer to the Settlement Section of this Court's Individual Rules in preparation for the conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 5/19/2021. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Plan Worksheet, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur Sanders on behalf of ARStrat, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Sanders, Arthur) |
| Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Corsini, Alexander) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Elvira Nicholson, Eric I. Honig. ARStrat, LLC served on 5/10/2021, answer due 5/31/2021. (Kleinman, Abraham) |
|
ORDER re #5 : The Motion of David Kim for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure the 150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee.Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 5/13/2021. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David S Kim on behalf of Eric I. Honig, Elvira Nicholson (notification declined or already on case) (Kim, David) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14458496. by Eric I. Honig, Elvira Nicholson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of David Kim, #2 IL Certificate of Good Standing of David Kim) (Kim, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to ARStrat, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ARStrat, LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14442338 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Elvira Nicholson, Eric I Honig. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kleinman, Abraham) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
