Scafidi v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. et al
| Eugene Scafidi |
| Midland Funding LLC and Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv03321 |
| June 12, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene Scafidi. Midland Funding LLC served on 7/13/2021, answer due 8/30/2021. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 10 CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Eugene Scafidi recover from Defendants theprincipal amount of $1,001.00, costs of $583.00, and attorneys fees in an amount as described inthe offer.Ordered by Clerk of Court on 7/30/2021. (Toritto, Jim) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Acceptance with Offer of Judgment by Eugene Scafidi (Attachments: #1 Proposed Judgment) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 8 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC. (Jiao, Chenxi) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to August 30, 2021 to Answer re #1 Complaint, All Defendants. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 7/22/2021. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Chenxi Jiao on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC (aty to be noticed) (Jiao, Chenxi) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Diana M. Eng on behalf of Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC (aty to be noticed) (Eng, Diana) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Eugene Scafidi. Midland Credit Management, Inc. served on 7/9/2021, answer due 7/30/2021. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Midland Funding LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Midland Credit Management, Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Midland Credit Management, Inc., Midland Funding LLC filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14560927 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Eugene Scafidi. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Proposed Summons) (Barshay, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
