Clark v. Medical Data Systems, Inc.
Ariana Clark |
Medical Data Systems, Inc. d/b/a Medical Revenue Service and Medical Data Systems, Inc. doing business as Medical Revenue Service |
2:2021cv03456 |
June 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
LaShann DeArcy Hall |
A Kathleen Tomlinson |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #6 Summons Returned Executed, #1 Complaint, with Consent up to and inclusive of September 2, 2021 by Medical Data Systems, Inc.. (Quinn, Lori) |
Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ariana Clark. Medical Data Systems, Inc. served on 7/22/2021, answer due 8/12/2021. (Barshay, David) |
Filing 5 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) which requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d)(3). An arbitration hearing will be scheduled after an Answer has been filed. (Credle, Rita) |
CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Medical Data Systems, Inc. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
Case Assigned to Judge LaShann DeArcy Hall and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Medical Data Systems, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14580066 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ariana Clark. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Barshay, David) Modified on 6/21/2021 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.