Babst v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.
| Tracey Babst |
| Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv03463 |
| June 18, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MOTION to Strike #7 Answer to Complaint Mistakenly Filed under Plaintiff's Name by Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE by Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. re #8 Answer to Complaint Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.1(a) Notice of Constitutional Challenge (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent FCO Holdings, Inc. for Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintff's Bankruptcy Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Bankruptcy Discharge Order) (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Tracey Babst. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Plaintff's Bankruptcy Petition, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Bankruptcy Discharge Order) (Johnson, Matthew) |
ORDER granting #6 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint: The time for Defendant to answer is extended to August 30, 2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 7/29/2021. (Vasquez, Lea)
|
| Filing 6 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, with consent extending time to file a responsive pleading up to and inclusive of August 30, 2021 by Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc.. (Quinn, Lori) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Tracey Babst. Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. served on 7/9/2021, answer due 7/30/2021. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE Designating Case To Arbitration. This case has been designated to participate in the Court Annexed Arbitration Program pursuant to Local Civil Rule 83.7(d) which requires the Clerk of Court to designate and process for compulsory arbitration all civil cases (excluding social security cases, tax matters, prisoners' civil rights cases, and any action based on an alleged violation of a right secured by the Constitution of the United States or if jurisdiction is based in whole or in part on Title 28 U.S.C. sec. 1343) wherein money damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest and costs. Damages are presumed not to be in excess of the arbitration limit unless a certification is filed in accordance with Local Civil Rule 83.7(d)(3). (Credle, Rita) |
| CASE REFERRED to Arbitration. (Credle, Rita) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14580230 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -no,, filed by Tracey Babst. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Barshay, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Babst v. Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracey Babst | |
| Represented By: | David M. Barshay |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Fair Collections & Outsourcing, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lori Jean Quinn |
| Represented By: | Matthew Brady Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
