Adeleke v. Suffolk County Police Department et al
| Abiodun Adeleke |
| Suffolk County Police Department and Detective James Stapleton |
| 2:2021cv03681 |
| June 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Gary R Brown |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Warden Letter from the Pro Se Department re Abiodun Adeleke. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 8 Summons Issued as to James Stapleton, Suffolk County Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Summons Issued as to Detective James Stapleton, #2 Summons Issued as to Police Commissioner (notice only), #3 Summons Issued as to Suffolk County Attorney (notice only)) (Tirado, Chelsea) |
Filing 7
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis - Accordingly, plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff is granted leave to file the complaint without prepayment of the filing fee; and IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court must forward to the United States Marshal Service for the Eastern District of New York copies of plaintiff's summonses, complaint, and this Order for service upon the defendants; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court must mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff at his address of record. SO Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/17/2021. (Tirado, Chelsea)
|
| Filing 6 Letter to pro se plaintiff Abiodun Adeleke from the Pro Se Department returning Consent Form without docketing or consideration. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Abiodun Adeleke. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Authorization by Abiodun Adeleke. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Case Reassigned to Judge Gary R. Brown. Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. (Document mailed to Party). (Bowens, Priscilla) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Stapleton, Suffolk County Police Department, filed by Abiodun Adeleke. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Affirmation of Service, #3 Envelope) (Bowens, Priscilla) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
