Gonzalez Ramirez v. Addy Hospitality LLC et. al.
| Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez |
| Addy Hospitality LLC d/b/a Rust & Gold, Frank Antonetti, Louis Cohen, Jason Janawsky and Addy Hospitality LLC doing business as Rust & Gold |
| 2:2021cv03768 |
| July 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Eric R Komitee |
| James M Wicks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference will be held at 9:00 am on 10/6/2021 before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks via Zoom. All counsel must attend. The Court will email a Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. Following the conference, the Court will issue a Discovery Order tailored to circumstances of this FLSA case. As such, counsel need not prepare a discovery worksheet prior to the initial conference. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/13/2021. (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
|
Filing 9
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by All Defendants. (Caridi, Nino)
|
|
Filing 8
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez. Jason Janawsky served on 7/28/2021, answer due 8/18/2021. (Nardo, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 7
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez. Louis Cohen served on 7/28/2021, answer due 8/18/2021. (Nardo, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 6
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez. Frank Antonetti served on 7/28/2021, answer due 8/18/2021. (Nardo, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 5
SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez. Addy Hospitality LLC served on 7/21/2021, answer due 8/11/2021. (Nardo, Raymond)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Addy Hospitality LLC, Frank Antonetti, Louis Cohen, Jason Janawsky. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Filing 3
In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Filing 2
This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Case Assigned to Judge Eric R. Komitee and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14625198 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes,, filed by Juan Carlos Gonzalez Ramirez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Nardo, Raymond) Modified on 7/8/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
