Kollmer v. Spelman, et al
Plaintiff: Somer & Heller LLP and Danielle Kollmer
Defendant: Donald Spelman and Nob Hill Apartments, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv03855
Filed: July 9, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Arlene R Lindsay
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Accommodations
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 9 SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by September 30, 2021. See the attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/30/2021. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(f) form) c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
August 6, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER re #8 : The time for Nob Hill Apartments, Inc. and Donald Spelman to answer, move or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to and including September 10, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/6/2021. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
August 5, 2021 Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Nob Hill Apartments, Inc., Donald Spelman. (Feather, David)
August 3, 2021 Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Nob Hill Apartments, Inc., Donald Spelman (Feather, David)
August 3, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by David S. Feather on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Feather, David)
August 2, 2021 Filing 5 AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons in a Civil Action, Complaint Jury Trial Demanded, Civil Cover Sheet served on Nob Hill Apartments, Donald Spelman on 7/22/2021, filed by Danielle Kollmer. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit For Defendant Spelman, #2 Affidavit For Defendant Spelman, #3 Affidavit For Defendant Nob Hill) (Siegel, Jesse)
July 19, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/19/2021. (Bowens, Priscilla)
July 12, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons #2) (Landow, Concetta)
July 12, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
July 12, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta)
July 12, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
July 9, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -yes,, filed by Danielle Kollmer. (Landow, Concetta) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/12/2021: #1 Summons #1, #2 Summons #2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Landow, Concetta).
July 9, 2021 FILING FEE: $ 402, receipt number BNYEDC-14641434 (Landow, Concetta)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Kollmer v. Spelman, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Somer & Heller LLP
Represented By: Jesse Siegel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Danielle Kollmer
Represented By: Stanley J. Somer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Donald Spelman
Represented By: David S. Feather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nob Hill Apartments, Inc.
Represented By: David S. Feather
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?