Tarantino v. The Kraft Heinz Company
Plaintiff: Kelly Tarantino and The Kraft Heinz Company
Defendant: Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Case Number: 2:2021cv04013
Filed: July 15, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: James M Wicks
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 8, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The return dates for Dean N. Panos' Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #9 , Kate T. Spelman's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #10 , and Alexander M. Smith's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #11 , shall be on September 14, 2021. In accordance with this Court's Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by September 12, 2021, at least two (2) days prior to the return date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/8/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
September 7, 2021 Filing 11 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14815244. by The Kraft Heinz Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Smith, Alexander)
September 7, 2021 Filing 10 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14815226. by The Kraft Heinz Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (Spelman, Kate)
September 7, 2021 Filing 9 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14815203. by The Kraft Heinz Company. (Attachments: #1 Declaration in Support of Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice, #2 Illinois Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Indiana Inactive Good Standing Letter, #4 Proposed Order) (Panos, Dean)
September 1, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The Motion of David Magagna for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, with registration being available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/1/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 31, 2021 Filing 8 EXHIBIT - Certificate of Good Standing in New Jersey by Kelly Tarantino. Related document: Order, #6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14722221. filed by Kelly Tarantino, Order on Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice,. (Magagna, David)
August 31, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The Motion of David C. Magagna for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice is denied with leave to renew upon submitting a certificate of the court for each of the states of which the applicant is a member of the bar, which has been issued within (30) thirty days of filing and states that the applicant is a member of good standing of the bar of that state court as set forth in Local Rule 1.3(c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/31/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 17, 2021 Opinion or Order The Motion of Charles E. Schaffer for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, with registration being available online at the NYED's homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/17/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The Motion of Charles E. Schaffer for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 is denied with leave to renew upon submitting a certificate of the court for each of the states of which the applicant is a member of the bar, which has been issued within (30) thirty days of filing and states that the applicant is a member of good standing of the bar of that state court as set forth in Local Rule 1.3(c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/13/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 13, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The Motion of David C. Magagna for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #6 is denied with leave to renew upon submitting a certificate of the court for each of the states of which the applicant is a member of the bar, which has been issued within (30) thirty days of filing and states that the applicant is a member of good standing of the bar of that state court as set forth in Local Rule 1.3(c). Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/13/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER: The return date for Charles E. Schaffer's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 shall be on August 12, 2021. In accordance with this Courts Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by August 10, 2021, at least two days prior to the return date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/5/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
August 5, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER. The return date for David C. Magagna's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #6 shall be on August 12, 2021. In accordance with this Courts Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by August 10, 2021, at least two days prior to the return date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/5/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy) Modified on 8/5/2021 (Ortiz, Grisel).
August 4, 2021 Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14722250. by Kelly Tarantino. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Cert of Good Standing) (Schaffer, Charles)
August 4, 2021 Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14722221. by Kelly Tarantino. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit, #2 Cert of Good Standing) (Magagna, David)
July 19, 2021 Filing 5 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Kelly Tarantino. The Kraft Heinz Company waiver sent on 7/16/2021, answer due 9/14/2021. (Sultzer, Jason)
July 16, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Kraft Heinz Company. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 16, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 16, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 16, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 15, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The Kraft Heinz Company filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14663021 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Kelly Tarantino. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Sultzer, Jason)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tarantino v. The Kraft Heinz Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kelly Tarantino
Represented By: Jason P. Sultzer
Represented By: Charles E. Schaffer
Represented By: Daniel Harris Markowitz
Represented By: David Magagna
Represented By: Joseph Lipari
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Kraft Heinz Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kraft Heinz Foods Company
Represented By: Dean N. Panos
Represented By: Alexander Smith
Represented By: Kate Spelman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?