Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD. v. Ryland Life Equipment et al
Plaintiff: Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD. doing business as Laurice & Co.
Defendant: Ryland Life Equipment and 19-69 Group AB
Case Number: 2:2021cv04062
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Pamela K Chen
Referring Judge: Steven I Locke
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2021 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to 19-69 Group AB, Ryland Life Equipment. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 20, 2021 Filing 4 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 20, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 20, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE by Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD. re #1 Complaint, Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Ederer, Louis)
July 20, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 19-69 Group AB, Ryland Life Equipment filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14672555 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A) (Ederer, Louis)
July 20, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna)
July 20, 2021 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. (Rodin, Deanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD. v. Ryland Life Equipment et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Laurice El Badry Rahme LTD. doing business as Laurice & Co.
Represented By: Louis Sherman Ederer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ryland Life Equipment
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: 19-69 Group AB
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?