St. Rose v. WalMart, Inc.
| Natanzia St. Rose |
| WalMart, Inc. |
| 2:2021cv04123 |
| July 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference is scheduled for September 29, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. by telephone before the undersigned. The Court will initiate the conference call. The call in instructions are as follows: The parties are directed to dial (888) 684-8852 prior to the scheduled time to access the call center. At the prompt enter access code 7625765. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 8/31/2021. c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Peikes, Lawrence) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Application granted on consent. The deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's letter, DE 8, is hereby EXTENDED to September 30, 2021. The pre-motion teleconference scheduled for September 27, 2021 is similarly ADJOURNED to October 15, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/30/2021. (Meil, Stephen)
|
| Filing 10 Second MOTION for Extension of Time to File response to pre-motion letter by Natanzia St. Rose. (Vandamme, Hendrick) |
|
ORDER striking #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference; granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re #9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference. Application granted on consent. The deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendant's letter, DE 8, is hereby EXTENDED to August 31, 2021. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/16/2021. (Meil, Stephen)
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference,,,,, , MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply by Natanzia St. Rose. (Vandamme, Hendrick) |
|
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Pre Motion Conference.A pre-motion telephone conference is scheduled for September 27, 2021 at 11:00 a.m. before Judge Gary R. Brown, at which time the parties should be prepared to address defendant's anticipated motion pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, DE 8. The parties are to call (888) 363-4734 using ACCESS CODE 4132441 five minutes prior to the designated time.The parties are on notice that in appropriate cases, the pre-motion letter and the response, along with the parties' arguments made at the pre-motion conference, may be construed at the discretion of the Court as the motion itself. Arguments not raised in the pre-motion letters or during the pre-motion conference shall be deemed waived. See In re Best Payphones, Inc., 450 F. App'x 8, 15 (2d Cir. 2011).At the conference, the Court will issue a briefing schedule if necessary. Plaintiff is directed to respond to DE 8 in accordance with the undersigned's individual rules by August 16, 2021. Before requesting an adjournment, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a joint letter with several proposed dates. The parties and other attendees to the conference are also reminded that the recording of any proceeding of the Court, including this conference, is prohibited under Local Rule 1.8. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 8/1/2021. (Meil, Stephen)
|
| Filing 8 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by WalMart, Inc.. (Peikes, Lawrence) |
|
Filing 7
SCHEDULING ORDER: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by August 30, 2021. See the attached Order for details. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 7/27/2021. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(f) Form) c/ecf (Imrie, Robert)
|
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Gary R. Brown for all further proceedings. Judge Denis R. Hurley no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such.Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 7/27/2021. (Davis, Kimberly)
|
| Filing 6 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 5 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Denis R. Hurley and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 4 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by WalMart, Inc. (Peikes, Lawrence) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a completed Civil Cover Sheet. Missing page 2. Please resubmit corrected Civil Cover Sheet. This event can be found under the event Other Documents - Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Lawrence Peikes on behalf of WalMart, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Peikes, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re #1 Notice of Removal, by WalMart, Inc. (Peikes, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by WalMart, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, case number 606148-2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14682559) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint) (Peikes, Lawrence) Modified on 7/26/2021 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: St. Rose v. WalMart, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Natanzia St. Rose | |
| Represented By: | Hendrick Vandamme |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: WalMart, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lawrence Peikes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
