Babad v. The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C.
| Ariella Babad |
| The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. |
| 2:2021cv04322 |
| August 2, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joanna Seybert |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Minute Entry for Initial Conference Hearing held on 9/13/2021 before Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione: Saland for Plaintiff; Arleo for Defendant. Settlement discussions were held but the parties were unable to reach a disposition at this time. The Court sets the following discovery deadlines: Deadline for completion of Rule 26(a) initial disclosures - 10/7/21; Deadline for motions to join new parties or amend pleadings - 10/7/21; All fact discovery to be completed by 3/14/22; Final date to take first step in dispositive motion practice - 4/14/22. Parties will advise the Court when a further settlement conference would be productive. (Vasquez, Lea) (Main Document 13 replaced on 9/13/2021) (Vasquez, Lea). |
| Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Saland, Tamir) |
| Filing 10 Letter regarding settlement position by Ariella Babad (Saland, Tamir) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ariella Babad. The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. served on 8/10/2021, answer due 8/31/2021. (Saland, Tamir) |
Filing 8
SCHEDULING ORDER: A conference will be held by phone at 11:00 a.m. on September 13, 2021 before the undersigned. The individual Plaintiff client and a principal with full settlement authority for the Defendant must participate in the conference with all counsel. The parties are to connect to the conference through dial-in number 888-557-8511 with access code 3152145. By September 9th, counsel are to submit letters to the Court via ex parte electronic filing, setting forth their respective settlement positions. A motion to file ex parte is not required.THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court, is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione on 8/11/2021. (Vasquez, Lea) Modified on 8/11/2021 (Vasquez, Lea).
|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1) (Arleo, Robert) |
| Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement by The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. (Arleo, Robert) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert L. Arleo on behalf of The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. (aty to be noticed) (Arleo, Robert) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/2/2021: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Ariella Babad against The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14713784 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ariella Babad. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A & B, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons) (Saland, Tamir) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Babad v. The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ariella Babad | |
| Represented By: | Tamir Saland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Levinbrook Law Firm, P.C. | |
| Represented By: | Robert L. Arleo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
