Moss v. Brentwood Union Free School District et al
| William King Moss, III |
| Brentwood Union Free School District, Cynthia Ciferri, Robert Feliciano, G. Paula Moore, Julia Burgos, Simone Holder-Daniel, Trustee Maria Gonzalez-Prescod, Eileen Felix, Richard Loeschner, vincent autera, wayne loper and Maria Gonzalez-Prescod |
| 2:2021cv04372 |
| August 4, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Margo K Brodie |
| Steven I Locke |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
SCHEDULING ORDER: The Court adopts Defendants' #12 proposed briefing schedule for their anticipated motion to dismiss. Defendants shall serve their motion on or before October 29, 2021; Plaintiff shall serve its opposition on or before November 30, 2021; and Defendants shall serve their reply, if any, and file their fully briefed motion on or before December 14, 2021. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/21/2021. (Ding, Leo)
|
| Filing 12 Letter re Proposed Briefing Schedule by Vincent Autera, Brentwood Union Free School District, Julia Burgos, Cynthia Ciferri, Robert Feliciano, Eileen Felix, Maria Gonzalez-Prescod, Simone Holder-Daniel, Richard Loeschner, Wayne Loper, G. Paula Moore (Lineen, Caroline) |
|
ORDER denying #8 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. The parties are directed to confer and file a proposed briefing schedule on or before September 20, 2021. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 9/13/2021. (Goss, Natasha)
|
| Filing 11 RESPONSE to Motion re #8 MOTION for pre motion conference filed by William King Moss, III. (Baptiste, Michele) |
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Order, #8 MOTION for pre motion conference by William King Moss, III. (Baptiste, Michele) |
|
ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' letter on or before September 10, 2021. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/24/2021. (Goss, Natasha)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for pre motion conference by Vincent Autera, Brentwood Union Free School District, Julia Burgos, Cynthia Ciferri, Robert Feliciano, Eileen Felix, Maria Gonzalez-Prescod, Simone Holder-Daniel, Richard Loeschner, Wayne Loper, G. Paula Moore. (Lineen, Caroline) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Lewis R. Silverman on behalf of All Defendants (aty to be noticed) (Silverman, Lewis) |
|
ORDER re #8 motion for pre-motion conference. The Court directs Plaintiff to respond to Defendants' letter on or before August 26, 2021. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/19/2021. (Goss, Natasha)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE re: Certified copy of Clerk's Minutes for the e-filed Supreme Court case, #604690/2021, along with a copy of the Notice of Removal from Suffolk County. (Tavarez, Jennifer) |
| Filing 6 COMPLAINT against All Defendants Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by William King Moss, III. (Attachments: #1 Verification, #2 Civil Cover Sheet) (Baptiste, Michele) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Brentwood Union Free School District, Julia Burgos, Cynthia Ciferri, Robert Feliciano, Eileen Felix, Maria Gonzalez-Prescod, Simone Holder-Daniel, Richard Loeschner, G. Paula Moore, vincent autera, wayne loper re #2 Notice(Other), #1 Notice of Removal, (Lineen, Caroline) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE by Brentwood Union Free School District, Julia Burgos, Cynthia Ciferri, Robert Feliciano, Eileen Felix, Maria Gonzalez-Prescod, Simone Holder-Daniel, Richard Loeschner, G. Paula Moore, vincent autera, wayne loper re #1 Notice of Removal, (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 Notice of Removal to EDNY) (Lineen, Caroline) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by All Defendants from Supreme Court Suffolk County, case number 604690/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14720696) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A Summons with Notice, #2 Exhibit B Demand for Complaint, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lineen, Caroline) Modified on 8/6/2021 (Landow, Concetta). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
