SynKloud Technologies, LLC et al v. Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC
| SynKloud Technologies, LLC and Serendia, LLC |
| Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC |
| 2:2021cv04423 |
| August 6, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| James M Wicks |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An Initial Conference via Zoom will be held at 10:00 AM on November 1, 2021 before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than October 25, 2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 10/1/2021. (Attachments: #1 Discovery Plan Worksheet, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Ortiz, Grisel)
|
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Jasjit Vidwan on behalf of Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Vidwan, Jasjit) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Taniel Ermano Anderson on behalf of Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Anderson, Taniel) |
|
ORDER. The Motion of Taniel E. Anderson for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #14 is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, with registration being available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/28/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
|
ORDER. The Motion of Jasjit S. Vidwan for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice #15 is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, with registration being available online at the NYEDs homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerk's Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/28/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
|
ORDER. The return date for Taniel E. Anderson's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #14 shall be on September 28, 2021. In accordance with this Court's Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by September 26, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/21/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
|
ORDER. The return date for Jasjit S. Vidwan's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #15 shall be on September 28, 2021. In accordance with this Court's Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by September 26, 2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/21/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Jasjit S. Vidwan Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14853351. by Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Affidavit of Jasjit S. Vidwan, #4 Proposed Order) (Vidwan, Jasjit) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Taniel E. Anderson Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14853175. by Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Affidavit of Taniel E. Anderson, #4 Proposed Order) (Anderson, Taniel) |
| Filing 13 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC (LaCava, Richard) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard LaCava on behalf of Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC (aty to be noticed) (LaCava, Richard) |
|
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint on behalf of Defendant Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. Response to complaint now due on or before 10/15/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 9/9/2021. (Wicks, James)
|
| Filing 11 Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint,, on behalf of Defendant Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC by Serendia, LLC, SynKloud Technologies, LLC. (Kiddie, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert Kiddie, Jr on behalf of Serendia, LLC, SynKloud Technologies, LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Kiddie, Robert) |
|
ORDER. The Motion of Robert Kiddie for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, with registration being available online at the NYED's homepage. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the $150 admission fee be submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/28/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
| Filing 9 AFFIDAVIT/AFFIRMATION re #7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Robert Kiddie Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14750972. (Corrected/Notarized Affidavit) by Serendia, LLC, SynKloud Technologies, LLC (Kiddie, Robert) |
|
ORDER. The Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 by Robert Kiddie, is denied with leave to renew upon properly notarizing the Affidavit in Support. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/27/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by SynKloud Technologies, LLC, Serendia, LLC. Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC served on 8/19/2021, answer due 9/9/2021. (Kiddie, Robert) |
|
ORDER: The return date for Robert Kiddie's Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice #7 shall be on August 20, 2021. In accordance with this Court's Individual Practice Rules, any opposition must be filed by August 18, 2021, at least two days prior to the return date. Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 8/14/2021. (Weinstein, Tracy)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice of Robert Kiddie Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14750972. by Serendia, LLC, SynKloud Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Affidavit of Robert Kiddie) (Kiddie, Robert) |
|
ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks for all further proceedings. Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/10/2021. (Bowens, Priscilla)
|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 5 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement by SynKloud Technologies, LLC identifying Corporate Parent Ideahub, Inc. for SynKloud Technologies, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Incorrect Document Entry Information. Corporate Disclosure Statement was filed as an attachment in docket entry 1. Document was saved and refiled as a separate entry. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $402, receipt number ANYEDC-14728446 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by SynKloud Technologies, LLC, Serendia, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Rule 26(a) Disclosure Corporate Disclosure Statement, #2 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark, #3 Proposed Summons, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Exhibit 1, #6 Exhibit 2, #7 Exhibit 3, #8 Exhibit 4, #9 Exhibit 5) (DeRienzo, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
