Martin v. Pristine Mitsubishi
Plaintiff: LaQuelle Martin
Defendant: Pristine Mitsubishi
Case Number: 2:2021cv04586
Filed: August 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: A Kathleen Tomlinson
Nature of Suit: Truth in Lending
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1640 Truth in Lending
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 30, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISMISSING CASE RE #6 Stipulation of Dismissal without costs pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 9/30/2021. (Coleman, Laurie)
September 29, 2021 Filing 6 STIPULATION of Dismissal by LaQuelle Martin (Kasell, David)
August 27, 2021 Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Pristine Mitsubishi, filed by LaQuelle Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit "A" RISC, #2 Exhibit Exhibit "B" Registration for Service Contract, #3 Exhibit Exhibit "C" Letter to cancel Service Contract) (Kasell, David)
August 16, 2021 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Pristine Mitsubishi. (Flanagan, Doreen)
August 16, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
August 16, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
August 16, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge A. Kathleen Tomlinson. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)
August 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Pristine Mitsubishi filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14752310 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by LaQuelle Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit "A" RISC, #2 Exhibit "B" Registration for Service Contract, #3 Exhibit "C" Letter to Cancel Service Contract, #4 Civil Cover Sheet, #5 Proposed Summons) (Kasell, David) Modified on 8/16/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. Pristine Mitsubishi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LaQuelle Martin
Represented By: David Michael Kasell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pristine Mitsubishi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?