3M Company v. IP Med Inc.
3M Company |
IP Med Inc. |
2:2021cv04658 |
August 18, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Gary R Brown |
Steven I Locke |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER granting DE #12 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. On consent, the deadline for Defendant to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended, nunc pro tunc, to and including 9/30/2021. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/17/2021. (Bartell, Max) |
Filing 12 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer (joint motion for 14-day extension of defendant's deadline to answer or otherwise respond to complaint) by 3M Company. (Horrell, Holley) |
Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Holley C. M. Horrell on behalf of 3M Company (notification declined or already on case) (Horrell, Holley) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Sybil L Dunlop on behalf of 3M Company (notification declined or already on case) (Dunlop, Sybil) |
ORDER granting DE #4 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that she receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/13/2021. (Bartell, Max) |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by 3M Company. IP Med Inc. served on 8/26/2021, answer due 9/16/2021. (Oxamendi, David) |
Electronic ORDER granting DE #6 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that she receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 9/2/2021. (Bartell, Max) |
Filing 8 Summons Issued as to IP Med Inc. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 7 Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Trademark. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14768370. by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Holley C. M. Horrell in Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Minnesota Certificate of Good Standing for Holley C. M. Horrell, #3 Exhibit California Certificate of Good Standing for Holley C. M. Horrell, #4 Proposed Order for Horrell PHV Motion) (Horrell, Holley) |
Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Plaintiff Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14768274. by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Sybil L. Dunlop in Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing for Sybil L. Dunlop, #3 Proposed Order re Dunlop PHV motion) (Dunlop, Sybil) |
Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 NOTICE by 3M Company re #1 Complaint, AO 120 Report on the Filing or Determination of an Action Regarding a Patent or Trademark (Oxamendi, David) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT 3M Company against IP Med Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14764654 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by 3M Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit, #7 Exhibit, #8 Exhibit, #9 Exhibit, #10 Exhibit, #11 Exhibit, #12 Exhibit) (Oxamendi, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: 3M Company v. IP Med Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: 3M Company | |
Represented By: | David Oxamendi |
Represented By: | Sybil L Dunlop |
Represented By: | Holley C. M. Horrell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: IP Med Inc. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.