The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee v. Lomuto et. al.
| Verizon Employee Benefits Committee and The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee |
| Kathy Lomuto, Kathy Lomuto-Stinsman and Michelle Stinsman |
| 2:2021cv05279 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee. Michelle Stinsman served on 10/1/2021, answer due 10/22/2021. (Gray, Katelynn) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee. Kathy Lomuto served on 9/28/2021, answer due 10/19/2021. (Gray, Katelynn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by James P. Hollihan on behalf of The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee (notification declined or already on case) (Hollihan, James) |
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields on 10/5/2021. (Mucciaccio, Dina)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14900575. by The Verizon Employee Benefits Committee. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Motion for Admission PRO HAC VICE, #2 Proposed Order) (Hollihan, James) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Kathy Lomuto, Michelle Stinsman. (Attachments: #1 Summons-Michelle Stinsman) (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kathy Lomuto, Michelle Stinsman filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14863188 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -YES,, filed by Verizon Employee Benefits Committee. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Proposed Summons to Kathy Lomuto a/k/a Kathy Lomuto-Stinsman, #12 Proposed Summons to Michelle Stinsman) (Gray, Katelynn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
