Bradin v. CoAdvantage Resources Inc. et. al.
| Nitzan Bradin |
| CoAdvantage Resources Inc., CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc. and Brian Finkel |
| 2:2021cv05331 |
| September 24, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Steven I Locke |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 18, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
Order re: DE #8 Stipulation Allowing Plaintiff to Amend Complaint; Waiving Defendants' Defenses; Extending time for Defendants to file Answer; and Request to So Order. The parties' joint stipulation is So Ordered; see attached. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 11/18/2021. (Pincsak, Lydia)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Catherine Tucciarello on behalf of CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc., CoAdvantage Resources Inc., Brian Finkel (aty to be noticed) (Tucciarello, Catherine) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Wendy J. Mellk on behalf of CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc., CoAdvantage Resources Inc., Brian Finkel (aty to be noticed) (Mellk, Wendy) |
| Filing 8 STIPULATION Allowing Plaintiff to Amend Complaint; Waiving Defendants' Defenses; Extending time for Defendants to file Answer; and Request to So Order by Nitzan Bradin (Kumar, Amit) |
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nitzan Bradin. CoAdvantage Resources Inc. served on 10/26/2021, answer due 11/16/2021. (Kumar, Amit) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nitzan Bradin. Brian Finkel served on 10/19/2021, answer due 11/9/2021. (Kumar, Amit) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Nitzan Bradin. CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc. served on 9/28/2021, answer due 10/19/2021. (Kumar, Amit) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc., CoAdvantage Resources Inc., Brian Finkel. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against CoAdvantage Resources 23 Inc., CoAdvantage Resources Inc., Brian Finkel filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14872368 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Nitzan Bradin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kumar, Amit) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
