Bugay v. Credit Control Services, Inc.
| Kyla Bugay |
| Credit Control Services, Inc. d/b/a Credit Collection Services and Credit Control Services, Inc doing business as Credit Collection Services |
| 2:2021cv05783 |
| October 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven I Locke |
| Consumer Credit |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to file Motion for Remand filed by Credit Control Services, Inc. (Johnson, Matthew) |
ORDER: In accordance with Defendant's representation that it wishes to withdraw its objections to Plaintiff's motion to remand #14 , the parties shall file a stipulation to remand by 12/17/2021. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 12/10/2021. (Walsh, Catherine)
|
| Filing 13 REPLY in Support re Scheduling Order, filed by Kyla Bugay. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ciccone v. Cavalry Portfolio Services, LLC, No. 21-CV-2428-JS-JMW, 2021 WL 5591725 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 29, 2021), #2 Exhibit Sputz v. Alltran Financial, LP, No. 21-CV-4663-CS, 2021 WL 5772033 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2021), #3 Exhibit Cavazzini v. MRS Associates, No. 21-CV-05087-ARR-ST, 2021 WL 5770273 (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 6, 2021), #4 Exhibit Soto v. Credit Control Services, Inc., No. 2:21-cv-06321-GRB-ST (E.D.N.Y. Dec. 3, 2021), #5 Exhibit Maddox v. Bank of New York Mellon Tr. Co., N.A., __ 4th __, No. 19-1774, 2021 WL 5347004 (2d Cir. Nov. 17, 2021)) (Barshay, David) |
|
ORDER: the Court construes Plaintiff's pre-motion letter #5 as a motion to remand. If the parties wish to submit any supplemental briefing concerning Plaintiff's motion to remand, they must do so by December 16, 2021. Ordered by Judge Joan M. Azrack on 12/9/2021. (Walsh, Catherine)
|
| Filing 12 NOTICE by Kyla Bugay of Supplemental Authority (Attachments: #1 Exhibit decision in Luisi v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC, 2:21-cv- 05725 (Nov. 16, 2021).) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 11 RESPONSE in Opposition re #5 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to file Motion for Remand filed by Credit Control Services, Inc. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by David M. Barshay on behalf of Kyla Bugay (notification declined or already on case) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE by Kyla Bugay re #5 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to file Motion for Remand NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Order in Williams v. Credit Corp Solutions, Inc. d/b/a/ Tasman Credit, 2:21-cv-05729-GRB-SIL (E.D.N.Y. October 26, 2021), #2 Exhibit Complaint in Williams v. Credit Corp Solutions, Inc. d/b/a/ Tasman Credit, 2:21-cv-05729-GRB-SIL (E.D.N.Y. October 26, 2021)) (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 8 ANSWER to Complaint by Credit Control Services, Inc. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Credit Control Services, Inc identifying Corporate Parent CCS Financial Services, Inc. for Credit Control Services, Inc. (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Brady Johnson on behalf of Credit Control Services, Inc (aty to be noticed) (Johnson, Matthew) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for pre motion conference seeking permission to file Motion for Remand by Kyla Bugay. (Barshay, David) |
| Filing 4 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 3 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet.. Re Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet, by Credit Control Services, Inc. d/b/a Credit Collection Services (Quinn, Lori) |
| Notice: Re: Incomplete Civil Cover Sheet. A Civil Cover Sheet was not filed; The Clerk's Office cannot assign this case without a Civil Cover Sheet. Counsel is directed to submit the Civil Cover Sheet using the event Proposed Summons/Civil Cover Sheet. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Credit Control Services, Inc. d/b/a Credit Collection Services from District Court of the County of Suffolk, Patchogue Sixth District Court, case number CV-2936-21BR. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14939592) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's State Court Complaint and Civil Summons) (Quinn, Lori) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
