O'Leary et. al. v. Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Plaintiff: William O'Leary and Lynne O'Leary
Defendant: Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2021cv06020
Filed: October 29, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Steven I Locke
Referring Judge: Joanna Seybert
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 29, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Re: #7 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice; The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/29/2021. C/ECF (Valle, Christine)
November 24, 2021 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Samsung SDI America, Inc. (Freed, David)
November 23, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jay Joseph Massaro on behalf of All Plaintiffs (aty to be noticed) (Massaro, Jay)
November 17, 2021 Opinion or Order ORDER granting in part and denying in part #4 Motion for Pre Motion Conference ("PMC Motion"): Having considered Defendant's PMC Motion and Plaintiffs' non-response thereto, see JS Individual Rule III(B)(1)(instructing "[t]he opposing party shall have seven (7) days to submit a letter response"), Defendant's PMC Motion is granted to the extent that, in its discretion, the Court waives the pre-motion conference and sets a briefing schedule on Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. Accordingly:(1) by no later than December 3, 2021, Defendant is to serve and file its dismissal motion;(2) by no later than January 7, 2022, Plaintiffs are to serve and file their response; and,(3) by no later than January 28, 2022, Defendant is to serve and file its reply, if any.Once the dismissal motion is fully briefed, the parties are to ensure courtesy copies of their submissions are promptly provided to Chambers. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 11/17/2021. c/ECF (Killigrew, Patricia)
November 12, 2021 Filing 5 STATE COURT RECORD received from the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk. Please find a Certified Copy of our Clerk's Minutes for the E-filed Supreme Court case, Index #619190/2021, along with a copy of the Notice of Removal or 8019(c) with order. (Coleman, Laurie)
November 5, 2021 Filing 4 Letter MOTION for pre motion conference by Samsung SDI America, Inc.. (Freed, David)
October 29, 2021 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen)
October 29, 2021 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen)
October 29, 2021 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Samsung SDI America, Inc. from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Suffolk, Case Number 619190/2021. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-14981066). Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A - Summons and Complaint filed in State Court, #3 Exhibit B - California Secretary of State Corporation Statement of Information, #4 Exhibit C - Affidavit of Service on SDIA) (Freed, David) Modified on 10/29/2021 (Flanagan, Doreen).
October 29, 2021 Case Assigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: O'Leary et. al. v. Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: William O'Leary
Represented By: Joseph G. Dell
Represented By: Jay Joseph Massaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lynne O'Leary
Represented By: Joseph G. Dell
Represented By: Jay Joseph Massaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samsung SDI America, Inc.
Represented By: David E. Freed
Represented By: Edward Pierce Abbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?