Latham v. Dzurenda
| Kasheem Latham |
| James Dzurenda |
| 2:2021cv06090 |
| November 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Joan M Azrack |
| Steven Tiscione |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Prisoner Authorization filed by Kasheem Latham. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 6 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Kasheem Latham. (Florio, Lisa) |
| Filing 5 Letter from Pro Se Office to Plaintiff Latham acknowledging receipt of the civil action and providing case number and Judge(s) assigned. All appropriate case opening documents provided in mailing. CM 11/15/21. (Grady, Jessica) |
| Filing 4 LETTER dated 11/4/2021 from Pro Se Department to pro se litigant. The enclosed document is being returned without docketing or consideration. This appears to be a notice of claim intended for the Nassau County Attorney. Please see the enclosed docket sheet for your new civil action with similar claims. (Coleman, Laurie) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE OF DEFICIENT FILING, litigant notified of deficiency(s) that must be corrected within fourteen (14) days. re: #1 Complaint. The papers are deficient as a filing fee of $402 is required in order to commence a civil action. Alternatively, you may request to waive the filing fee by completing an in forma pauperis (IFP) application. Lastly, you must also complete the Prisoner Authorization (PLRA) form. CM 11/2/2021 (Cox, Dwayne) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against James Dzurenda Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Kasheem Latham. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Cox, Dwayne) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Latham v. Dzurenda | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kasheem Latham | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: James Dzurenda | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
