Reid v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
Ramone Reid |
United Parcel Service, Inc. and Darren Zigon |
2:2021cv06123 |
November 3, 2021 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
Pamela K Chen |
Steven I Locke |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, filed by United Parcel Service, Inc., Darren Zigon . Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice - Fee of $150.00 paid Tracking ID: ANYEDC-15121385, Approval Code: 005294. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit In Support of Motion to Admit Counsel Pro Hac Vice, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Ohio, #3 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing - Illinois) (Goico, Allison) Modified. (Latka-Mucha, Wieslawa) |
Filing 10 INITIAL CONFERENCE ORDER: A Tele-Initial Conference is set for 1/26/2022 at 12:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. The parties should dial 1-877-336-1829 and enter access code 3002871# at the prompt. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke on 12/14/2021. (Attachments: #1 SIL Individual Rules, #2 Scheduling Order Worksheet) (Gandiosi, Kristin) |
Filing 9 ANSWER to #6 Amended Complaint by All Defendants. (Li, Ya) |
Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ramone Reid. Darren Zigon served on 11/29/2021, answer due 12/20/2021. (Phillips, William) |
Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Ramone Reid. United Parcel Service, Inc. served on 11/17/2021, answer due 12/8/2021. (Phillips, William) |
Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service, Inc., Darren Zigon, filed by Ramone Reid. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Notice of Right to Sue) (Lewis-Bonilla, Darnisha) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Darren Zigon. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to United Parcel Service, Inc. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Case Assigned to Judge Pamela K. Chen and Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United Parcel Service, Inc., Darren Zigon filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-14996084 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Ramone Reid. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons UPS, Inc, #3 Proposed Summons Darren Zigon) (Lewis-Bonilla, Darnisha) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.