Ortiz v. Google LLC
| Kasandra Ortiz |
| Google LLC |
| 2:2022cv00154 |
| January 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Anne Y Shields |
| Assault Libel & Slander |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Google LLC (Mollick, Jason) |
| Filing 5 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 4 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
| Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Google LLC identifying Corporate Parent Alphabet Inc., Corporate Parent XXVI Holdings Inc. for Google LLC. (Mollick, Jason) Modified on 1/11/2022 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Jason Blake Mollick on behalf of Google LLC (notification declined or already on case) (Mollick, Jason) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Google LLC from Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Nassau, Case Number 21-000708. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15182572). Was the Disclosure Statement on the Civil Cover Sheet completed - Yes. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Certificate of Service) (Mollick, Jason) Modified on 1/11/2022 (Flanagan, Doreen). |
Order of Remand to State Court. Defendant Google LLC has removed this pro se action from Nassau County Supreme Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. In order to invoke diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1332, a plaintiff must demonstrate to a reasonable probability that the claim is in excess of the statutory jurisdictional amount of $75,000. Hicks v. Leslie Feely Fine Art, LLC, 2021 WL 982298, at *4 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 16, 2021). While we presume that the face of the complaint is a good faith representation of the actual amount in controversy, that presumption may be rebutted by a demonstration to a legal certainty that the plaintiff could not recover the amount alleged.... Suarez v. Mosaic Sales Sols. US Operating Co., LLC, 720 F. App'x 52, 53 (2d Cir. 2018) (citations omitted). In her action, the plaintiff alleges in graphic detail that will not be repeated here that she launched an illegal massage business and sets forth allegations purportedly relating to a defamatory faux website launched against her, an act of revenge against Sex Workers, who reject potential clients; which is illegal practice. DE 1-1. After she decided to quit Sex work to open her own Christian Ministry, which aims to get Sex Workers out of their profession, plaintiff allegedly asked Google to remove the content of said website, which the company purportedly was unable to do. Id. She seeks $50 million in compensation. On the basis of these allegations, the Court finds to a legal certainty and beyond any doubt -- that plaintiff cannot recover damages sufficient to satisfy the jurisdictional minimum. Accordingly, the matter is remanded to the Nassau County Supreme Court, and the Clerk is to close the file. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 1/11/2022. (Brown, Gary)
|
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Anne Y. Shields. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Flanagan, Doreen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ortiz v. Google LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Kasandra Ortiz | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Google LLC | |
| Represented By: | Jason Blake Mollick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
