Harris v. Walmart, Inc.
Plaintiff: Clay Harris
Defendant: Walmart Inc,
Case Number: 2:2022cv01489
Filed: March 16, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Joan M Azrack
Referring Judge: Steven I Locke
2 Judge: Joanna Seybert
3 Judge: Steven Tiscione
Nature of Suit: Contract Product Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER terminating #12 Motion to Reassign Case: See Chief Judge Brodie's March 31, 2022 Electronic ORDER REASSIGING CASE. Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 4/13/2022. c/ECF (Killigrew, Patricia)
March 31, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Joanna Seybert and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione for all further proceedings. Judge Joan M. Azrack, Magistrate Judge Steven I. Locke no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 3/31/2022. (Bowens, Priscilla)
March 30, 2022 Filing 12 Letter MOTION to Reassign Case by Clay Harris. (Reich, Mark)
March 18, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE by Clay Harris Notice of Related Cases, Pursuant to L.R. 1.6(a) (Reich, Mark)
March 18, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark S. Reich on behalf of Clay Harris (aty to be noticed) (Reich, Mark)
March 18, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Courtney Elizabeth Maccarone on behalf of Clay Harris (aty to be noticed) (Maccarone, Courtney)
March 17, 2022 Filing 8 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Cubano, Jazmin)
March 17, 2022 Filing 7 Case transferred in from District of Ohio Southern; Case Number 2:21-cv-05924. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received.
March 17, 2022 The case of 2:21-cv-05924, has been transferred from Southern District of Ohio to the Eastern District of New York. The new case number is 2:21-cv-05924. PLEASE NOTE: if you plan to continue representing your client(s), you must be admitted to practice before this court. You must do so by applying for Pro Hac Vice or permanent admission. To apply for Pro Hac Vice admission, you must first register for an ECF login and password. Please visit the Court's website at www.nyed.uscourts.gov/attorney-admissions for guidance. Once registered, you must electronically file a Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice. You must pay the required pro hac vice fee online. (Cubano, Jazmin)
March 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STIPULATED ORDER OF TRANSFER. This action is transferred to the Eastern District of New York as related to Ahmed v. Walmart, Inc., case no. 2:21-cv-6890. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 3/16/2022. (kk2) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
March 16, 2022 Case transferred to the Eastern District of New York (Central Islip). Case file and docket sheet sent Electronically. (kk2) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
March 9, 2022 Filing 5 STIPULATION Joint Stipulation to Transfer Action to Eastern District of New York by Plaintiff Clay Harris. (Cummins, James) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
March 9, 2022 Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed. Waiver sent to Walmart, Inc. on 2/24/2022, answer due 4/25/2022. (Cummins, James) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
December 30, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE by Plaintiff Clay Harris Civil Cover Sheet (Cummins, James) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
December 30, 2021 Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Walmart, Inc.. (daf) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]
December 29, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against Walmart, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 paid - receipt number: AOHSDC-8653705), filed by Clay Harris. (Attachments: #1 Summons Form Summons Form) (Cummins, James) [Transferred from Ohio Southern on 3/17/2022.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Harris v. Walmart, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clay Harris
Represented By: James Rubin Cummins
Represented By: Courtney Elizabeth Maccarone
Represented By: Mark S. Reich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Walmart Inc,
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?