Parker-Barns v. Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc.
| Karen Parker-Barns |
| Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. doing business as Baron Auto Emporium |
| 2:2022cv02397 |
| April 27, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Contract: Other |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc.. (Johnson, Robert) |
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer. The time for Defendant to answer, move against or otherwise respond to the complaint is extended to June 27, 2022. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay on 6/2/2022. (Jacobwitz, Beth)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, Stipulation Extending time for defendant to answer or move against complaint through and including 6-27-22 with request for Court approval of extension by Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc.. (Johnson, Robert) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard S. Naidich on behalf of Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Naidich, Richard) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Karen Parker-Barns. Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. served on 5/5/2022, answer due 5/26/2022. (Lemberg, Sergei) |
| Case reopened pursuant to 5/2/2022 Electronic Order. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
|
ORDER granting #5 Motion for Reconsideration. The motion for reconsideration is GRANTED, and the Order of Dismissal is hereby Vacated. However, this Order is without prejudice to any other defense the defendant may wish to bring. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/2/2022. e/ecf (Tahbaz, Joseph)
|
| Civil Case Terminated pursuant to 4/29/2022 Electronic Order Dismissing Case. (Tirado, Chelsea) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Reconsideration re Order Dismissing Case, by Karen Parker-Barns. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Dismissal of her Complaint for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction) (Hirnyk, Vlad) |
|
VACATED pursuant to 5/2/2022 Electronic Order of Judge Brown. This entry has been modified on 5/3/2022 to indicate order has been vacated. ORDER DISMISSING CASE: Whereas, examination of this complaint reveals that the dispute involves approximately $13,500 in repairs, the case fails to satisfy either the minimum for diversity jurisdiction or the $50,000 threshold for the Magnuson-Moss Act. The case is therefore DISMISSED without prejudice to filing in an appropriate venue. The Clerk is respectfully directed to close the case. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 4/29/2022. c/ecf (Cowan, Timothy) Modified on 5/3/2022 (Tirado, Chelsea).
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15512421 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No,, filed by Karen Parker-Barns. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Hirnyk, Vlad) Modified on 4/27/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura). |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Parker-Barns v. Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Karen Parker-Barns | |
| Represented By: | Vlad Hirnyk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Sunrise Auto Outlet, Inc. doing business as Baron Auto Emporium | |
| Represented By: | Richard S. Naidich |
| Represented By: | Robert P. Johnson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
