Thomas et al v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC et al
| David Thomas and Ambonique Thomas |
| Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC and Smithtown Nissan Inc. |
| 2:2022cv02514 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of New York |
| Gary R Brown |
| Arlene R Lindsay |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1601 Truth in Lending |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Thomas, Ambonique Thomas. Smithtown Nissan Inc. served on 5/20/2022, answer due 6/10/2022. (Kidd, Novlette) |
| Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by David Thomas, Ambonique Thomas. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC served on 5/19/2022, answer due 6/9/2022. (Kidd, Novlette) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Ambonique Thomas, David Thomas (Kidd, Novlette) |
| Filing 4 AMENDED COMPLAINT FIRST against Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Smithtown Nissan Inc., filed by David Thomas, Ambonique Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Advertisement, #2 Exhibit 2 - Receipt, #3 Exhibit 3 - RIC page 1, #4 Exhibit 4 - VSC Page, #5 Exhibit 5 - PMA Page, #6 Exhibit 6 - TPW Page, #7 Exhibit 7 - KRA Page, #8 Exhibit 8 - Blank Odometer Statement, #9 Exhibit 9 - RIC, #10 Exhibit 10 - Correction Notice, #11 Exhibit 11 - Attorney General 2004 Announcement, #12 Exhibit 12 - Attorney General 2009 Announcement, #13 Exhibit 13 - Attorney General 2011 AOD) (Kidd, Novlette) |
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Whereas specific damages are not specified, plaintiffs are to write a letter to this Court within seven days of this filing explaining in detail why this matter is ineligible for arbitration pursuant to the Eastern District of New Yorks Local Civil Rule 83.7(d). Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/4/2022. c/ecf (Cowan, Timothy)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 2 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta) |
| This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Nissan Motor Acceptance Company LLC, Smithtown Nissan Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15527288 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by David Thomas, Ambonique Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons) (Kidd, Novlette) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
