Fassler et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Fassler and Diane Fassler
Defendant: Exactech, Inc. and Exactech, US, Inc.
Case Number: 2:2022cv02633
Filed: May 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Gary R Brown
Referring Judge: Lee G Dunst
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Prod. Liability
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2022 Opinion or Order SCHEDULING ORDER: Initial Conference set for 8/11/2022 at 10:15 a.m. before Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst via the Court's video Zoom. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. The parties are directed to follow Judge Dunst's Individual Practice Rules, which are available on the Court's website. Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 6/21/2022. (Baron, Corey)
June 16, 2022 Filing 10 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Exactech, US, Inc. identifying Corporate Parent Exactech, Inc. for Exactech, US, Inc.. (Singer Mekles, Erica)
June 16, 2022 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Exactech, Inc. identifying Other Affiliate Osteon Holdings, Inc. for Exactech, Inc.. (Singer Mekles, Erica)
June 16, 2022 Filing 8 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc.. (Singer Mekles, Erica)
June 14, 2022 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst. Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Ortiz, Grisel)
June 2, 2022 Filing 7 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeffrey Fassler, Diane Fassler. Exactech, US, Inc. served on 5/26/2022, answer due 6/16/2022. (Gold, Danielle)
June 2, 2022 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jeffrey Fassler, Diane Fassler. Exactech, Inc. served on 5/26/2022, answer due 6/16/2022. (Gold, Danielle)
May 10, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Summons #2) (Landow, Concetta)
May 10, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Landow, Concetta)
May 10, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge Steven Tiscione. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Landow, Concetta)
May 9, 2022 Filing 5 Notice of Related Case: The Civil Cover Sheet filed in this civil action indicates a related case. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Landow, Concetta).
May 9, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/9/2022: #1 Additional Corrections) (Landow, Concetta).
May 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Exactech, Inc., Exactech, US, Inc. filing fee $ 402, receipt number ANYEDC-15543811 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -NO,, filed by Jeffrey Fassler, Diane Fassler. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons as to Defendant Exactech, Inc., #3 Proposed Summons as to Defendant Exactech, US, Inc.) (Gold, Danielle)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fassler et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Fassler
Represented By: Danielle Megan Gold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Diane Fassler
Represented By: Danielle Megan Gold
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, Inc.
Represented By: Erica Michelle Singer Mekles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Exactech, US, Inc.
Represented By: Erica Michelle Singer Mekles
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?