Weppler v. Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck
Plaintiff: Kathleen Weppler
Defendant: Highfield Garden Care Center of Great Neck and Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck
Case Number: 2:2022cv02905
Filed: May 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of New York
Presiding Judge: Ann M Donnelly
Referring Judge: Cheryl L Pollak
Nature of Suit: Personal Inj. Med. Malpractice
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of Appearance by Nicole Varisco on behalf of Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck (aty to be noticed) (Varisco, Nicole)
June 3, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER denying #5 motion for a pre-motion conference. On review of the parties' submissions #5 #10 , the Court imposes a brief stay and will hold motion practice in abeyance pending the Second Circuit's resolution of two cases that are likely to be instructive in this action. See Rivera-Zayas v. Our Lady of Consolation Geriatric Care Center, et al. (No. 21-2164); Leroy v. Hume (Nos. 21-2158, 2159). The parties must file a joint status report within one week of the Second Circuit's decisions in these appeals, or by October 31, 2022, whichever date is earlier. The defendant's request for a pre-motion conference is denied without prejudice to renewal. In addition, the deadline for the plaintiff to file a motion to remand is being held in abeyance. Ordered by Judge Ann M. Donnelly on 6/3/2022. (Baer, Nicholas)
May 31, 2022 Filing 10 RESPONSE to Motion re #5 First MOTION for pre motion conference Pre-Motion Conference filed by Kathleen Weppler. (Attachments: #1 Orders) (Kanter, Brett)
May 31, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Ann M Donnelly and Chief Magistrate Cheryl L. Pollak for all further proceedings. Judge Gary R. Brown, Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks no longer assigned to case Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/31/2022. (Bowens, Priscilla)
May 27, 2022 Filing 9 Letter Response to Order to Show Cause by Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck (Lawless, Megan)
May 27, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER: In light of the Order to Show Cause and the parties' responses thereto, and on consent, this matter is respectfully referred to the Clerk of the Court for reassignment to to a United States District Judge in Brooklyn. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/27/2022. c/ecf (Cowan, Timothy)
May 26, 2022 Filing 8 Letter responding to Order to Show Cause regarding reassignment by Kathleen Weppler (Kanter, Brett)
May 26, 2022 Opinion or Order ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: This action was removed from the Supreme Court of the State of New York County of Queens relating to an incident that occurred in Nassau County. Counsel accurately responded to the questions on the Civil Cover Sheet, and the matter was assigned to the "'Long Island Division' of the Eastern District, consisting of Nassau and Suffolk Counties." In re Jury Plan, 61 F.3d 119, 120 (2d Cir. 1995). Pursuant to 28 USC Section 1446(a), an action removed from a state court must be heard in "the district court of the United States for the district and division within which such action is pending." Title 28 U.S.C.A. 1406 provides that a "district court of a district in which is filed a case laying venue in the wrong division or district shall dismiss, or if it be in the interest of justice, transfer such case to any district or division in which it could have been brought." The Court recognizes that counsel bears no responsibility for the assignment, which appears to be erroneous. As such, counsel for both parties are to advise the Court in writing by June 1, 2022 as to whether there is an objection to reassignment to a district judge in the Brooklyn courthouse. Ordered by Judge Gary R. Brown on 5/26/2022. c/ecf (Cowan, Timothy)
May 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULING ORDER: An initial conference via Zoom will be held at 3:30 PM on 7/12/2022 before Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. The Court will email the Zoom invitation closer to the conference date. All counsel must attend. Counsel are directed to complete the attached Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order and electronically file same with the Court no later than 7/8/2022. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. THE PARTIES ARE REMINDED that audio or video recording of proceedings by any party other than the Court is strictly prohibited by Local Civil Rule 1.8. Violation of this rule may result in sanctions, including removal of court issued media credentials, restricted entry to future hearings, denial of entry to future hearings, or any other sanctions deemed appropriate by the Court. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks on 5/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Rule 26(f) Scheduling Order, #2 JMW Individual Rules) (Flanagan, Doreen)
May 24, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Brett Kanter on behalf of Kathleen Weppler (aty to be noticed) (Kanter, Brett)
May 24, 2022 Filing 5 First MOTION for pre motion conference Pre-Motion Conference by Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Stay Decisions) (Lawless, Megan)
May 23, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan A. Lawless on behalf of Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck (notification declined or already on case) (Lawless, Megan)
May 19, 2022 Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Jakubowski, Laura)
May 19, 2022 Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made. (Jakubowski, Laura)
May 19, 2022 Case Assigned to Judge Gary R. Brown and Magistrate Judge James M. Wicks. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Jakubowski, Laura)
May 18, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck from Supreme Court Queens County, case number 707719/2022. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ANYEDC-15576942) Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -No (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex.A - S&C.pdf, #2 Exhibit Ex.B - AOS of S&C.pdf, #3 Exhibit Ex.C - Martinez - Rivera - Brief for Defendants-Appellants...pdf, #4 Exhibit Ex.D - Leroy - Brief obo Brookdale Hospital Defendants.pdf, #5 Exhibit Ex.E- Leroy - Brief obo Mt. Sinai Hospital Defendants.pdf, #6 Exhibit Ex.F - Leroy - 2nd Circuit - Plaintiff's Brief in Leroy v. Hume.pdf, #7 Exhibit Ex.G - Martinez Brief obo Pltf-Appellee.pdf, #8 Exhibit Ex.H - Leroy - Reply Brief obo Defendants..pdf, #9 Exhibit Ex.I - Leroy Reply Brief obo Co-Def.pdf, #10 Exhibit Ex.J - Rivera-Zayas - Reply Brief.pdf, #11 Exhibit Ex.K - Amicus Briefs pending before the Second Circuit.pdf, #12 Exhibit Ex.L- Chamber of Commerce AMA Amicus Brief.pdf, #13 Exhibit Ex.M - Motion to File Amicus Curiae Brief & Proposed Amicus Brief.pdf, #14 Exhibit Ex.N - US Statement of Interest (M.D. Tenn) Centeno., #15 Civil Cover Sheet) (Braverman, Dylan) Modified on 5/19/2022 (Jakubowski, Laura).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the New York Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Weppler v. Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kathleen Weppler
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Guzman
Represented By: Brett Kanter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highfield Garden Care Center of Great Neck
Represented By: Dylan C. Braverman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Highfield Gardens Care Center of Great Neck
Represented By: Dylan C. Braverman
Represented By: Megan A. Lawless
Represented By: Nicole Varisco
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?